09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Frazier, Foreman, Dempsey, Holmes, Louis and probably Marciano and Tyson are the<br />

excellent ones. Some of the good ones are <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong>, Ken Norton, the young<br />

Floyd Patterson, and so forth. For average, we might include Riddick Bowe or<br />

Lennox Lewis or maybe someone like Jimmy Ellis. Now we get to weak and poor,<br />

where we find Oscar Bonavena, George Chuvalo, Alfredo Evangelista, Joe Bugner,<br />

Ron Lyle, and others. <strong>The</strong>n there are hundreds of heavyweights who somehow got a<br />

license and fought bouts, winning some and losing others, but never even<br />

headliners. A good heavyweight on a great night might stand a chance against<br />

an excellent one on a poor night. Otherwise, though, there is little chance an<br />

average fighter like Riddick Bowe would beat an excellent fighter like Ali or<br />

Frazier. It could happen, and there have been big upsets, but it's so improbable<br />

as to be ridiculous to discuss. After all, could Roger Clemons strike out Ed<br />

Kranepool? Yes, and usually would. Over the course of many games, would<br />

Kranepool ever take Clemons over the center field wall? It could happen, but<br />

would be highly unusual. Could we please knock off all this speculation over<br />

whether Joe Bugner or Tommy Morrison could KO George Foreman or Joe Louis on a<br />

big night? As far as I'm concerned, it's a waste of breath. You folks know too<br />

much about boxing to fritter away your time in these pointless discussions of<br />

what weak boxers might have done. My opinion only and no hard feelings, OK?<br />

And yes, I was just too sentimental to admit it at the time, but when I went<br />

to Ali-Norton II, Ken did win a decision but was robbed. It was close but not<br />

that close. One more thing. You should all know before coming to this web<br />

site that boxing is historically the most corrupt, sleaziest, most lowdown and<br />

cheatin' sport of all. In fact, the most dishonest sports are, in order: 1.<br />

Boxing2. Boxing 3. Boxing4. Boxing 5. Boxing 6. Cock fights<br />

7. Roller derby If you don't believe me, ask any former pro boxer,<br />

or sports writer. Furthermore, boxing rankings are 99.9% pure hokum, false, jive<br />

and dishonest. Promoters use them to hype boxers. How many times have you seen<br />

a young heavyweight with a record of 7-0 against bartenders and chickens and<br />

corpses suddenly ranked #9 one month, then #6 the next month, and finally at #3,<br />

signed to fight whoever the champ is in that organization? It happens regularly<br />

and has forever. That's how lousy fighters sometimes get big fights, and how<br />

lousy fights are promoted. Remember, like most businesses, boxing promotion<br />

is done to earn money. Niceties like fairness, truth and justice are usually not<br />

part of the picture. |<br />

|9/3/03 04:24:52 AM|Massimo|Rome||.com||||10|Tubby-You are very right about<br />

the Tyson-Sapp fight !Mike Tyson has to fight serious boxers like<br />

Rahman,Tua,Briggs,Akinwande, the Klitschko brothers, Samil San etc. Sapp is just<br />

a fat clown ( as a boxer, of course). Clifford is another clown ( as a boxer, of<br />

course). He has to train every day, not once a year ! I have read that Sapp real<br />

height is 6'3", not 6'7". I hope Shaq's height is really 7'1", not 4'2" ! Tyson<br />

better than Norton ? I'm not sure ! How could you judge Lewis an average boxer ?<br />

Are you joking ? He is a champion, surely one of the best 20 heavyweights of all<br />

times. How could you judge Bonavena,Chuvalo, Bugner and Lyle weak and poor ? I<br />

have to repeat the question: are you joking,Tubby ? Have a nice time !|<br />

|9/3/03 07:56:43 AM|John Gerard|NYC||rock289z@yahoo.com||||10|TO TUBBY: If you<br />

think Ron Lyle fell into the "weak and poor" category I must question your<br />

knowledge of boxing or the criteria you use to judge fighers. He was very good.|<br />

|9/3/03 08:03:45<br />

AM|Roadscholarette|Chicago||roadscholarette@hotmail.com||||10|Tubby -<strong>The</strong><br />

bottom line is that any boxer who has had even a few<br />

pro or very active amateur fights has already begun to incur some<br />

brain damage…no matter how<br />

undamaged he may appear.***Everyone knows or has heard about someone who<br />

has been enormously messed up from just one blow to the head in an accident, so<br />

in truth, it's a miracle more boxers aren't actually killed in the ring than<br />

are. All have damage, even ones who don't show outward signs, and all punches

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!