January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

CA||Sonia81@aol.com||||10|I LOVE YOU TOO DADDY COOL!|
|7/2/02 07:46:46 AM|John Gerard|NYC||rock289z@yahoo.com||||10|Saw Klitchko
batter Ray Mercer on HBO.Its true Mercer had seen better days but the
Russian showed he can throw every punch well, is light on his feet, is
technically sound, and does not cut (he swells). The only thing he did not
demonstrate was if he can take a punch or if he has heart. If he has those 2
qualities he may be the best since Ali and Foreman. Those are ver bigs IFs,
however.|
|7/2/02 08:46:04 AM|evren|london||@||||10|I agree Klitschko looked really good
and is destined for the very top. What we need is to see him against a fighter
on the way up - one with desire. There are not many heavies I see out there with
that burning desire to win. The future of the heavyweight division is terrible
with the only few decent heavies are ones in their thirties so there the
Klitschko's stand alone !!!|
|7/2/02 11:41:14 AM|JIMMY DORSEY|VENTURA
CALIFORNIA||RONNYRAINS@YAHOO.COM||||10|DEAR EVERN: CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR
FIGHTER LENNOX LEWIS RECENT VICTORY,NOTHING TO DOWNLOAD LEWIS TALENT, BUT WHO
HAS TYSON EVER BEAT, NOT MANY PUNCHERS OBVIOUSLY!LOOK AT HIS RECORD(NO
PUNCHERS). DON KING IS A SMART MAN,NO -
BOWE,MERCER,MORRISON,WITHERSPOON,FOREMAN,COONEY,MOORER, ONLY HOLYFIELD(BECAUSE
THEY THOUGHT HE WAS PAST HIS PRIME AND TOO MANY RING WARS) WHICH TYSON DID NOT
HAVE TO ENDURE!!THAT IS ANOTHER THING ABOUT WHY LEWIS IS FIGHTING THIS WAY AT
HIS AGE,VERY LITTLE WEAR, ANYWAY CONGRATS!!|
|7/2/02 04:37:54 PM|Evren|London||@||||10|Sorry for the delay in the next round
: - Evander Holyfield meets Tony Tucker and Jerry Quarry meets Ezzard Charles -
another two great matches.I do not agree with the opinion that Tyson has'nt
beat anyone...on the contrary I think he beat alot of very good fighters and
beat alot of them easily. He is amongst the top 10 heavyweights who ever lived,
in my opinion. Above Lewis.|
|7/2/02 06:29:28 PM|Joe Krause|Chicago||sadmspats@yahoo.com||||10|I think Tucker
was a pretty decent fighter, but Holyfield would win a pretty lop-sided
decision, let's say 9-3. Charles and Quarry match up similiarly in terms of
talent, I think this would go the distance with Jerry taking a close decision.
Charles was the better fighter historically, but he was at his best at lower
weights and was naturally smaller. I think Jerry was better then past-prime
Walcott, although he was a real good fighter against Marciano, who is over-rated
himself. I think the 50's heavies are a run of the mill group to be honest with
you.|
|7/3/02 02:42:16 AM|EVREN|LONDON||@||||10|I have seen a lot of Charles film
including some in his prime and cannot see Quarry beating him - Ezzard takes a
points decision in a good match or late round cuts stoppage. Evander by decision
over Tucker - say 9-3 or 8-4 in rounds.|
|7/3/02 07:20:06 AM|John Gerard|NYC, NY||rock289z@yahoo.com||||10|As a side
note, I think that one of the most under rated punchers of all time was
IngomarJohansson. Note I did NOT say one of the most under rated fighters.,
I mean when just measuring punching power. Johansson's right was just as good as
any punch ever thorwn by anyone -- but Ingo had no left, could not take a punch
and hated to train. But he is very under rated when it comes to sheer punching
power. He eaily kayed Machon,Cooper, Patterson (once!), and others. The guy
could really hit.|
|7/3/02 08:28:44 AM|Joe Krause|Chicago||sadmspats@yahoo.com||||10|It has to be
taken into account though Evren that Charles was really at his best at light-
heavy where he had his best form. He had the weakest crop of title defenses in
history and that includes Patterson. If you were to put Charles in his prime as
a heavyweight then you have a fighter that never really exsisted. Charles
wasn't ever in his real prime as a heavyweight. By 1948-1949 he had been in
many wars with Bivins, Moore and other decent light heavies in the mid 40's. I