09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

name another fighter who achieved what George did over a period of 30 years<br />

including the Olympic Gold with these limited abilities.I love <strong>Quarry</strong> to bits<br />

and have most of the material available on him. But to say that he could have<br />

beaten Foreman is unrealistic in my opinion. True, you never can tell what can<br />

happen in the ring but statistics speak for ability in this case.For those who<br />

say George is just a slugger I say to them you have EXTREMELY LIMITED knowledge<br />

of Boxing.Watch Foreman against Jack O'Halloran and see how George outboxes the<br />

bigger man for a few rounds then destroys him. |<br />

|12/6/02 07:34:55 PM|Jeffery Smith|New Orleans||jls@runbox.com||||6|Perhaps I'm<br />

overrating him here, but in retrospect, whenever I expected George to win, he<br />

lost (Ali, Young, Holyfield, Morrison), and whenever I expected <strong>Jerry</strong> to lose,<br />

he won (Foster, Lyle, Shavers, Mathis). And it is because he won against<br />

overwhelming power punchers. My "vision" of <strong>Jerry</strong> is not from 1974 on, but<br />

between 1967 and 1974, when he was at his prime. Some fighters are able to fight<br />

and do a credible job for 3 decades (Foreman), and some are at their peak for a<br />

relatively short time (<strong>Quarry</strong>, Frazier). I thought Frazier was unbeatable. I<br />

thought Foreman was unbeatable. I thought Tyson was unbeatable. When they lost,<br />

they lost BIG, as in humiliating defeats. <strong>Jerry</strong> was tiny by today's standards,<br />

but he packed more oomph in 200 lbs than anyone other than Dempsey and<br />

Marciano.<strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong> had the misfortune of having been born in the same<br />

era as Frazier and Ali. He was a much smarter and faster boxer than Foreman. I<br />

love George to death, but he was a bulldozer who could be avoided. He was<br />

probably at his best when he fought Boone Kirkman the first time because he<br />

didn't stop to admire his work. Two years later, he stopped not to admire his<br />

work but to catch his breath. His feet were in cement. <strong>Jerry</strong> had a field day<br />

with guys with their feet in cement.I'm not trying to be difficult. I<br />

rehearsed <strong>Quarry</strong> versus Foreman 1,000 in my head. <strong>Jerry</strong> always won. :-<br />

)By the way, I saw Jack O'Halloran fight many times (he became a San<br />

Diego native soon after George ate his lunch). Another truly good guy, but not a<br />

fighter. Mac Foster demolished him in one as I remember.|<br />

|12/6/02 07:45:09 PM|Gerry Schultz|Ohio||geraldschultz162@msn.com||||10|On this<br />

Foreman thing, Evren you certainly have right to your view, and I may be<br />

repeating my take on this, but I don't see big George your way. Foreman was<br />

runner-up for the Olympics in '68. <strong>The</strong> winner was a <strong>Quarry</strong>-like Clay Hodges, who<br />

went to Vietnam, so George could win the gold. George won that gold by being a<br />

huge intimidating kid, not by being the best, which is no discredit to Foreman.<br />

<strong>The</strong> best man cannot win if he doesn't think he can. Foreman has admited to<br />

respecting <strong>Quarry</strong> a great deal, and dodging him. <strong>The</strong>y make a great match,<br />

slugging/pursuing George vs. tough/ counterpunching quicker <strong>Quarry</strong>, which was<br />

the same thing, basically as Frazier/<strong>Quarry</strong>. Only <strong>Jerry</strong>'s lack of defense skills<br />

kept him from beating Joe, who he could clearly outbox. Joe had better<br />

fundementals than George, but not his size. <strong>The</strong> Foreman I recall had flat feet,<br />

poor balance, no real jab, and poor defense, power and size being his major<br />

assets. I don't agree that George is #2, considering Louis, Marciano, Tyson,<br />

Tunney and others who dominated for long stretches with just one belt to chase.<br />

Foreman did look perhaps his best in Frazier2, but as Perielta, Lyle, Young and<br />

Ali showed, could be outboxed by guys who weren't intimidated by him. <strong>Jerry</strong><br />

definitely fits that profile. We will never be able to truly solve this, and<br />

it's just opinion, but I see <strong>Jerry</strong> as a match for not just for Foreman, but also<br />

Norton, Holyfield and Larry Holmes, all of whom many regard pretty highly.<br />

Movement fighters with height, like Ali and Ellis, to me, gave <strong>Quarry</strong> more<br />

trouble than the Lyles and Shavers who charged him, as George undoubtedly<br />

would.|<br />

|12/6/02 08:18:52 PM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||oriononside@aol.com||||10|Jimmy D, I<br />

spoke to Bobby <strong>Quarry</strong> earlier in the week and he said the Battle of <strong>The</strong> Bouncers<br />

and tribute to <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong> is going to be <strong>January</strong> 4, 2003 at <strong>The</strong> Dome in<br />

Bakersfield, formally called Strongbow Stadium. It looks like it is a go this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!