09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

|8/10/03 04:38:56 PM|JIMMY DORSEY|VENTURA<br />

CALIFORNIA||RONNYRAINS@YAHOO.COM||||10|HEY Forest how you doing? i'll tell you<br />

my man JQ sure could come off the canvas to score knockouts,Joe Alexander,AL<br />

"Memphis" Jones(and a broken jaw and 4 lost teeth).Alexander said <strong>Jerry</strong> was they<br />

only one he ever fought,that got up to win,you can also throw in Rufus<br />

Brassell,although <strong>Quarry</strong> was decked after the bell.<strong>Jerry</strong> even got off the canvas<br />

to kayo Roy Crear in San Antonio.|<br />

|8/10/03 04:57:51 PM|JIMMY DORSEY|VENTURA<br />

CALIFORNIA||RONNYRAINS@YAHOO.COM||||10|FOREST: As always "SMOKIN" JOE FRAZIER<br />

always had that fire,you are talking about,only Foreman bounced him out,(of<br />

course never fought Lyle,Shavers)I was 14 when he fought <strong>Jerry</strong> in '74.i'd<br />

already been fighting amateur at a place now called the Dome, and lived<br />

boxing,already had over a hundred boxing mags etc.Anyway the day <strong>Jerry</strong> signed<br />

for FRAZIER,My uncle had the names wrong,and told me '"HEY YOUR BOY'S FIGHTING<br />

FOR THE TITLE VS FOREMAN" I was elated,then found out it was Frazier,bummed<br />

out,my uncle saidWhy u so down in the dumps,I said <strong>Jerry</strong> needed to be fighting<br />

Bonavena,or Bugner or Henry Clark. Anybody but JOE (he needed Joe like a hole in<br />

the head).One of the few times i'd wished I WAS WRONG!! TAKE CARE.|<br />

|8/11/03 09:27:34 AM|Kent|La Habta, Ca||oriononside@aol.com||||10|Forest, it is<br />

not illogical to say that Holmes' title defense agaisnt Cooney was one of his<br />

more difficult title defenses. After all, it was one of his fights where he<br />

lost a fair ammount of rounds. When the defense took place has a lot to<br />

do with the merit of his opponent's performance. Only four of Holmes 13<br />

defenses between 1978 and 1982 could be termed difficult, Shavers, Snipes,<br />

Weaver, and yes, Cooney. This was during Holmes' prime. Witherspoon occured in<br />

1983 and it could be included in this period as it is close to it. But it is the<br />

only controversial decision during this period. <strong>The</strong> Williams defense however<br />

happened in 1985 when Holmes was already on the way down, skill-wise, and M.<br />

Spinks caught Larry at the right moment. Cooney's performance in 1982 may very<br />

well have beaten Holmes circa 1985 or 86. Why is it hard to agree that Cooney<br />

had one good fight in him, the Holmes fight? Remember, I agree with you that<br />

Cooney was a limited fighter.|<br />

|8/11/03 02:51:29 PM|Forest Ward|South Carolina||joekevin@cs.com||||10|Hi Kent I<br />

did not write that it was illogical to say that one of Holmes's tougher<br />

defense's was against Cooney.I wrote that it is illogical to give Cooney a pass<br />

on the Spinks and Foreman fights because Cooney had a drug habit. It is not<br />

fair to Spinks or Foreman to cheapen their victory over Cooney just because<br />

Cooney did not train as he should have. Spinks and Foreman were dedicated<br />

fighters. Cooney was partying and getting high, they wanted it more, and they<br />

deserve the credit for their victories. Kent, come on is really fair to Foreman<br />

and Spinks not to count their victories, because Cooney was hooked on drugs and<br />

alcohol?Kent, I have a problem with saying Cooney had a "good" fight<br />

against Holmes. Good compared to what: Scot Frank, Ossie Ocasio... If that is<br />

your barometer fine. It's not mine. Cooney was knocked down in the second<br />

round. Cooney was exhausted after the 10th round; and stopped in the 13th<br />

round. I don't see that as good. Holmes played Cooney like a violin. I have no<br />

doubts Holmes could have stopped him sooner if Holmes so desired. Kent,<br />

to look at my philosophy from a different perspective, lets look at <strong>Jerry</strong><br />

<strong>Quarry</strong>. <strong>Jerry</strong> is highly regarded on this site for many reasons. Most notably<br />

for beating good fighters resoundingly in their primes, or damn near close to<br />

their primes: Spencer, Mathis, Foster, Lyle, Shavers, among others. All #1<br />

fighters at the time of their defeats by <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong>. If "all" we had to judge<br />

<strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong> was his noble loss to Frazier in their 1st fight would we be<br />

singing his praises as many (not you Kent) on this site do for Cooney. I think<br />

not. Granted Cooney had a good a left hook, but that's it. He did not<br />

have the drive and courage it takes to be a genuine good or great fighter. When<br />

one looks at Cooney's career, it's all in many peoples eyes a great "oh what

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!