09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

point I made in my last post. It is not me who is in denial about Ali. But his<br />

fans who cannot be objective, and are stuck in a child like awe of the boxer.<br />

<strong>The</strong> guy was a class A hypocrite.|<br />

|12/24/03 10:41:39<br />

AM|Roadscholarette|Chicago||roadscholarette@hotmail.com||||10|My husband<br />

remembers Ali mocking punchy fighters. Also, the laughable trip to Africa. Ali<br />

was told he wouldn't be around hostile action in Vietnam, but didn't believe it.<br />

He was fed all kinds of scare scenarios by the Muslims who wanted to control<br />

him, and believed them. I don't see Ali as having the depth to opt out of the<br />

war for the reasons he gave, and know what it really meant. He could do<br />

nice things, and he could be cruel and sadistic. He also seemed to enjoy being<br />

cruel so much more. <strong>The</strong> cohabitation of both tends to negate the former. Could<br />

he have been told how bad it was to carry and torture inferior fighters? What to<br />

say re the war, in order to look good? Other little PR moves? Whoever told him<br />

to denigrate Frazier, and emphasize black stereotypes was a real genius, or<br />

maybe the real Ali was coming out. Once more, when such radical opposing<br />

behaviors both present themselves, you're usually right to look to the dark side<br />

as the real person. Star-struck America, and really the whole world is so<br />

desperate for idols, custom-made ones yet to whom they assign God-like<br />

qualities, that Ali's legend will only grow. I don't know which is worse<br />

- waaay back, olden times, when record keeping was shoddy or non-existent, or<br />

today, when it's slick and smooth, and history is edited and reshaped,<br />

fictionalized even, till it becomes sufficiently legendary or fulfills some<br />

agenda. |<br />

|12/24/03 10:47:27 AM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Forest:<br />

Ali is a paradox---but I'd stop short of calling him a Class A hypocrite. I'm<br />

sure that 25 years ago, when I was younger and more in awe of him as an idol and<br />

an athlete, I would find no fault with Ali and would be in the total denial you<br />

talk about. Now, I can stand back and agree with you on some of your<br />

assertions. Ali made some mistakes and did exhibit some hypocricy at times---<br />

He's not "Saint Muhammad" by any means. I still regard him as a great boxer and<br />

sometimes great man who in a lot of ways, changed pro sports. He and Cosell<br />

weren't just in the right place at the right time---they MADE it the right place<br />

at the right time. |<br />

|12/24/03 10:54:09 AM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|One thing<br />

they CAN'T change about history is the films (Well, on second thought, they<br />

probably can do that too!). But when you watch Ali and Frazier "get it on" you<br />

see what heavyweight boxing used to be! <strong>The</strong> tape doesn't lie: <strong>The</strong>se guys put it<br />

on the line like very few fighters today ever will. It was a different time---<br />

and it makes me laugh when I read the posts claiming that Tyson would be so<br />

scary to someone like Joe Frazier. Tyson couldn't gut it out against Holyfield.<br />

FOREMAN---OLD FOREMAN---gutted it out against Holyfield and damn near beat him.<br />

HOLMES---OLD RETIRED HOLMES---gutted it out against Holyfield and took him the<br />

distance. Put Tyson in with one of the in-prime 70's heavies and provided the<br />

fight went more than a few rounds, he'd lose the battle of the wills. |<br />

|12/24/03 12:29:51<br />

PM|Roadscholarette|Chicago||roadscholarette@hotmail.com||||10|Lots of times,<br />

people fall into the "good old days" syndrome, a trap where things from the past<br />

gain an aura and take on qualities they really didn't have when they were<br />

actually happening. However, 70s boxing isn't that way - top champions for any<br />

age, top tenners all, with contenders who would have been champions in many<br />

other eras. Every single champ & contender had the guts and fighting heart of a<br />

timber wolf, did in fact, raise the bar in that regard. Sometimes too,<br />

people will do the reverse, and devalue past athletes and events in comparison<br />

to the star of the present. I like Evander Holyfield immensely, and think he was<br />

a great champion. Tyson had his time as well, and was a devastating boxer.<br />

However, what two "old men" did with them indicates that the going might have

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!