09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

for the wildcard uppercut to win by KO and turn a spotty performance into a<br />

memorable classic. This is what GREAT Champions are made of. Lewis has lost<br />

fights, and plodded his way to dull wins against opponents he should have<br />

outclassed easily. Simply, I don't think you can mention him with the alltime<br />

greats. He leads the pack of the second tier.On another note, I love<br />

reading this board to see everybody's recall of the super fights and fighters of<br />

the 60's and 70's. It seems amazing to call the 60's and 70's a "simpler time"<br />

because of all the social commotion that was going on---but part of me thinks<br />

that we all love to go back in our minds to a time when we were younger---and<br />

watching the <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong> video accomplishes that! Wow, it's <strong>Jerry</strong> in his 20's<br />

and 30's, in his prime, taking me back to a time when I was a young kid enjoying<br />

boxing on TV. Some of the older people who write on this board might have been<br />

about <strong>Jerry</strong>'s age at the time, in the prime of their lives. Sorry to bore<br />

everyone! But I do have a question for all of you: Who would win Norton vs.<br />

Lennox Lewis? If both were in their primes, I think this would be an<br />

interesting fight. Mr. Norton was the arch nemesis of my favorite, Ali (Well,<br />

maybe Frazier was the ARCH nemesis, but Norton was right up there!). Norton<br />

certainly earned my respect by beating Ali in their first fight, winning on<br />

points against a prime Jimmy Young, the devastating KO of Bobick, KO of Lorenzo<br />

Zanon and even the win over JQ, as well as the loss to Holmes. <strong>The</strong> irony is<br />

that Norton showed how much heart he had in that loss more than in most of his<br />

wins. He had trouble against the larger guys like Foreman and (late in his<br />

career) Cooney. To me, this one might be too close to call. I don't think it<br />

would go the distance---but then again, Norton-Holmes went the full 15. But<br />

against Lennox Lewis, I would think that either Lewis would back him up like<br />

Foreman and Shavers did, landing the heavy leather to take Norton out early---or<br />

Norton would find his groove, wear Lewis down, and win by middle round KO or<br />

TKO. What does everyone else think? |<br />

|6/26/03 07:35:04 AM|John Gerard|NYC||rock289z@yahoo.com||||10|ON NORTON VS.<br />

LEWIS: Norton was a hard guy to evaluate. He looked great in all of his fights<br />

against Ali (in my opinion he easily won the third one) and against <strong>Quarry</strong> and<br />

Young. He looked really bad against Shavers and Foreman. I don't count the<br />

Cooney fight as he was so old at the time. He did have excellent stamina and<br />

good punch and was a thinking man in the ring. If Lewis went out there<br />

headhunting and throwing power shots he would probably ko Norton. If Lewis<br />

fought his usual tentative style he would lose a decision or be kayoed in a late<br />

round. Too close too call both me were good, both had flaws that could be<br />

exploited by an expert. |<br />

|6/30/03 12:23:08 PM|Dan Cunningham|San<br />

Francisco||DGCSOCCER@AOL.COM||||10|Having looked through some of the comments<br />

made in the past from certain individuals. I would have to disagree with them<br />

about the quality of Gerry Cooneys fighting ability. Cooney may not have given<br />

us the match-ups that we wanted to see but I can say that Cooneys left hook was<br />

devastatingly lethal. I have watched several of his fights and several hours in<br />

sparring as well as reading how foes rated him. Sure he lacked good<br />

training,jab, right hand but there were a lot of champions who did not have<br />

certain tools required but who made up for it(tried to) with the ones they had.<br />

Cooney could bang with the left. Ask Jimmy Young, Ron Lyle or Ken Norton.<br />

Whether he fought them when they were 37 or 27, I think they could rate his<br />

punch better than some of the people downplaying Cooney in this arena!|<br />

|6/30/03 02:26:25 PM|JIMMY DORSEY|VENTURA<br />

CALIFORNIA||RONNYRAINS@YAHOO.COM||||10|One thing I DO know Dan IS Cooney did<br />

have a good left hook,wether he'd have beaten a younger lyle,Norton,is<br />

questionable,another thing We know for sure in NEVADA,when he fought Foreman, we<br />

were rooting big time for George,and very concerned about Big GEORGE'S SAFETY|<br />

|6/30/03 10:48:46 PM|Kent Appel|L:a Habra, Ca||oriononside@aol.com||||10|Dan.<br />

you are right, Cooney had a great left hook and he was a good fighter. <strong>The</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!