09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

get a feel for his fighting!Link:<br />

http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/Lodge/6525/JJJ.htm|<br />

|10/4/03 01:10:43 PM|Massimo|Rome||5||||10|Mc Cline has just beaten Boswell by<br />

KO 10.I don't think Mc Cline is a top 10 contender, but he would be a<br />

good test for Mike Tyson...Jameel is no Clifford...|<br />

|10/4/03 01:59:38 PM|Evren|London||@||||10|I did'nt say Chuvalo was stopped<br />

prematurely. Some people (chuvalo amongst them) felt this way. |<br />

|10/4/03 02:09:53 PM|Massimo|Rome||5||||10|Evren-I have understood this<br />

! I just wanted to add my opinion. I think Chuvalo didn't have a chance in the<br />

wordl to beat ( or of beating, or to beating...Boh !) Foreman. I'm happy that<br />

fight was stopped at that point, because Foreman could have hurt Chuvalo badly.|<br />

|10/5/03 02:39:24 AM|Ed|Cicero n y||mooseygoop@aol.com||||10|That site on<br />

Jefferies was interesting R S but as I am sure you know boxing back then was a<br />

world apart from boxing now. Did you check his record? <strong>The</strong>y're mostly exhibitons<br />

against same opponent. <strong>The</strong> heavyweight title back then was sort of a thing that<br />

when you got it you hoarded it, very political too. Thats why that ad by Sam<br />

Langford said he'd fight anyone but Jefferies...Sam knew the ad wouldnt be<br />

credible if it was asking for a heavy title shot, this article turned it around<br />

and made it look like Langford was afraid of Jefferies..from what I read about<br />

Langford he wasn't afraid of anyone and would certainly have loved to get a<br />

title shot but he knew the limitations of black fighters back then. <strong>The</strong> main<br />

reason comparsions aren't doable is the disorganization of boxing back then.<br />

Much smaller pools of good fighters which means you don't have the attrition<br />

factor like you do now. Fighters sometimes went years between title fight and<br />

still won..what does that tell you? If fighters do that now they come back<br />

extremely rusty looking. Also back then you didn't have the amateur programs<br />

like you do now and whens the last time you remember a top heavyweight fighter<br />

that didn't have an extensive (successful) amateur background? And the sickening<br />

racism of the day took the black fighters out of the picture, think of what<br />

boxing would have looked like in the past 30 years if the blacks had been<br />

eliminated from boxing.Thats not to take anything away from Jefferies, in<br />

his "protected" day he was the best. And one could say if he was a modern day<br />

fighter he would have had amateur experience and such but its just conjecture to<br />

compare from back then. My guess is might he might have been an Andrew Golota<br />

type fighter. Golota had similar athletic abilities, 10 second 100 yard dash,<br />

etc..|<br />

|10/5/03 05:57:34 AM|Massimo|Rome||5||||10|About Toney:I don't<br />

understand how a fighter can add so much weight in so little time without<br />

becomingfat ! He beat Holyfield very well. He is a great fighter, a warrior.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact that a former middleweight can beat a heavyweight bothersme. I<br />

don't understand boxing.|<br />

|10/5/03 08:44:12<br />

AM|Roadscholarette|Chicago||roadscholarette@hotmail.com||||10|Ed –You’re<br />

right, the fight scene was ~very~ different then, as were the styles of<br />

fighting. When they refer to the “fleet footed” Corbett or Fitzsimmons, we<br />

aren’t exactly talking Muhammad Ali flitting like a water bug on speed around a<br />

befuddled Sonny Liston. A “big punch” ~could~ be a big fish in a small pond as<br />

well, as could the ability to take one, or claims of stamina when guys spent a<br />

lot of time just standing in the ring looking at each other. So to say they<br />

could have been plopped down in Manilla or Madison Square Garden and done well<br />

is not something to put your money on. Many old timers would have adapted, but<br />

some would not have. Johnson and Langford were obviously not the only blacks who<br />

had the ability to fight well, but with the way things were, others just figured<br />

it wasn’t worth their time to endure the hassles of trying to establish<br />

themselves.As for records, we have a modern day comparison. Not to take<br />

anything away from Earnie Shavers, but one reason his KO % is so awesome (67 out<br />

of 73 fights) is his competition. <strong>The</strong>re were only three fighters I’ve ever heard

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!