09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

heavyweight boxing. As stated by many, including myself, he had great heart,<br />

tremendous courage, he gave everything and many of his fights were historically,<br />

very significant. So for everything that <strong>Jerry</strong> contributed to boxing, I consider<br />

him to be a great heavyweight. That doesn't mean that he is championship<br />

material, however. During <strong>Jerry</strong>'s time, Frazier, Ali and Foreman were champions.<br />

Ali, in my opinion, was the greatest, because of what he did for boxing, as well<br />

as his boxing skills. Frazier was a great heavyweight, as well, although much of<br />

his greatness came as a result of his meetings with Ali. Foreman could also be<br />

considered great, because during his brief reign, he did dominate the<br />

imaginations of many boxing fans. But I see <strong>Jerry</strong> as greater than George,<br />

because the whole picture shows a man who gave it all, went out with nothing,<br />

but is remembered as one of the great heavyweights of a bygone era. |<br />

|12/16/03 09:47:58 PM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Pete, <strong>Jerry</strong><br />

was better than a lot of heavyweight champions. Was he better than the top ten<br />

of all time, which you practically listed in your post? No he wasn't, but he<br />

was better than other linear champions such as L. Spinks, M. Spinks (possibly,<br />

<strong>Quarry</strong>/M.Spinks- a competitive match), Johannson, Sharkey, Tommy Burns, Max Baer<br />

(<strong>Jerry</strong> would have outboxed him), an older George Foreman, Moorer, Jess Willard,<br />

Primo Canera, and maybe even Schemling. <strong>Jerry</strong> was also cetainly better than<br />

most of the split champions.Pete, championship caliber and the all time<br />

upper elite are two different things.|<br />

|12/17/03 12:37:05 AM|Gerry Schultz|Cleveland,<br />

Ohio||jgschultz11@msn.com||||10|As already said, I definitely feel JQ was<br />

championship-caliber, and better than Jimmy Ellis, who showed JQ a lot of<br />

respect in their match. Given that Ellis was a very good heavy, this is a real<br />

compliment. Also as said before, I consider JQ a former champ anyway. He<br />

certainly had the respect of every top heavy and champ in his era, which is<br />

almost certainly the best ever in boxing. My question was about the draws, how<br />

he looked at them ( perhaps not nearly as seriously as he should have ), and his<br />

mentality, attitude and confidence. It takes quite a bit of something to charge<br />

Joe Frazier, a top champ he nearly beat, or to take on Norton with virtually no<br />

preparation. JQ certainly had plenty of voices telling him how good he was, way<br />

more supporters than Joe Frazier or Ken Norton, each of who may have saw these<br />

fights more clearly than <strong>Jerry</strong>. <strong>The</strong>re were these draws, and shrugging statements<br />

in losses to Machen, Ellis, Ali I, Chuvalo as well as his approaches to Frazier<br />

I and Norton that make me want to ask about how he saw himself and these<br />

matches. I don't feel <strong>Jerry</strong> could have beat Ali, two matches weren't necessary<br />

to prove that point, but Ali I's quick end gave him room to talk, I've read that<br />

<strong>Jerry</strong> really did believe he could have won, I guess I wonder where that comes<br />

from. He was as good as Frazier early in their matches, and was confident enough<br />

to try Joe twice. Again I think he could have beat Norton, but not realistically<br />

the way he ended up meeting him, where was he at, at this point? He had the<br />

talent to have great moments against these champs, was there something in the<br />

hoopla or his own attitude that prevented <strong>Jerry</strong> from going maybe a little<br />

further? As a fan, I guess that's my question. He never flinched versus Shavers,<br />

who wanted a round-one KO, and ended up being one, and was just incredible<br />

against Lyle, yet gave much different efforts in other fights. Even at the<br />

Superstars, so way up one year, so down the other. I get the feeling <strong>Jerry</strong> was<br />

very approachable as a person, but a much different personality in the gym<br />

/ring. Again, I'd like to know more about his attitudes through all this.<br />

Thanks. |<br />

|12/17/03 05:30:34 AM|Massimo|Rome||4||||10|Yeah, <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong> was better than<br />

Carnera, but Primo was better than Ruiz, for God's sake ! Don' t you agree, Paul<br />

? What do you think about a matchup Carnera-Toney ? Be carefully, our friendness<br />

( or friendship ? I don't remember, anyway one of the two) is on the line<br />

!RS-I'd love to see Chicago Bulls- Lakers once in my life ! You have<br />

Eddy Curry "Baby Shaq". If you meet Eddy there in Chicago, look up and say "

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!