09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

there.<strong>The</strong>y where only middleweights,but their shoulders looked huge in their<br />

suits.Your correct,Cyclone Hart was never the same after that fight.|<br />

|11/21/03 01:43:49 AM|Paul|Sydney, Australia||PlMls4@aol.com||||10|Giancarlo -<br />

the saddest thing about you is that you probably don't even realise that you are<br />

an intellectual snob. You wrote, "My allegation that most of you are uneducated<br />

and in fact not especially intelligent." Not having had the opportunity to<br />

attain high education is a crime, is it ?" And you imply that people have a<br />

CHOICE about being intelligent or unintelligent. In fact, you mention it ad<br />

nauseum, ensuring than everyone on this site recognises you as the bigot you<br />

are. Further, the first utterance falling from that bloated overfed face of<br />

yours was that you are some Hollywood 'big shot' of 40 years standing. Wow, that<br />

answers it. Now we all know why you're so smart and grammatically correct. Guess<br />

we all should remember you from some Godfather film, eh ? And, Giancarlo, to<br />

denigrate a dead man who never claimed to be anything other than a boxer, you<br />

raised accusations of arrest records, DUI, narcotics, womanising, brawls etc.<br />

You don't have to be a boxer to have sinned. In Hollywood you don't get an Oscar<br />

until you've sinned seriatum. Anyway, you're probably too busy to be thinking up<br />

any more insults about all us dumb folks. You and your Hollywood mindlikes are<br />

probably tied up consoling poor old Michael Jackson. Wacko might be a child<br />

molester, but at least he ain't makin' dumb ass grammatical errors like us<br />

uneducated dumbos on the <strong>Quarry</strong> site. In Australia, Giancarlo, intellectual<br />

snobs and 'big noters' and bigots who talk ill of the dead in front of the dead<br />

person's family are fed to the crocodiles. |<br />

|11/21/03 02:01:58 AM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Giancarlo,<br />

did you hear <strong>Jerry</strong> utter racist terms or do you know someone who heard him say<br />

these things? But even if he did, does that mean he had no character at all?<br />

Because after all, he may have uttered such things in a time of anger and they<br />

were isolated incidents. It seems to be a subjective opinion on your part that<br />

<strong>Jerry</strong> was racist and while it is also a subjective opinion on my part as well<br />

that he wasn't, people such as Joe Frazier, George Foreman, and Muhammad Ali<br />

were counted as being friends of <strong>Jerry</strong>'s and these three men would hardly<br />

associate with anyone who deep down detested them because of their race. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

are, in my book, good judges of character. Besides, some people could make the<br />

same argument about Ali being a racist but I don't believe he is. I believe Ali<br />

made some mistakes in his life and he learned from them and he is a better man<br />

because of these same mistakes.Yes, <strong>Jerry</strong> had a criminal record but that<br />

just shows he made some mistakes in his life, that he wasn't perfect. <strong>The</strong> only<br />

thing I can go by is my subjective view as to how someone treated me and while I<br />

barely knew <strong>Jerry</strong> and our paths only crossed on a few occasions, he was a<br />

gentleman towards me. Although this is another subjective opinion on my part, I<br />

can usually tell the content of someone's character just by looking in someone's<br />

eyes. What I sensed was that <strong>Jerry</strong> was a decent fellow.Is not your<br />

critical post about the grammatical errors and education level of some of our<br />

posters in itself an ad hominem non argument? Content can often still come<br />

through even when structure is not accurate. Attacking ones' education level<br />

proves nothing but your own arrogance.Also, your view that <strong>Jerry</strong> got<br />

creamed in several of his key fights is subjective as well as I can say he<br />

didn't get creamed (my subjective feeling) and we can go back and forth all day<br />

long and not prove anything.At least you did acknowledge that <strong>Jerry</strong> was<br />

better than you alluded to in your post but I am not sure how you could think<br />

otherwise if you have seen all of <strong>Jerry</strong>'s fights. Yes <strong>Jerry</strong> was a class below<br />

Ali, Foreman, Frazier, and Holmes, but he was ranked as the twenty-seventh best<br />

heavyweight of all time in Ring magazine's list of the top fifty heavyeights<br />

ever and that goes a long way to show <strong>Jerry</strong> was a great fighter.|<br />

|11/21/03 02:29:06 AM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Hey Paul,<br />

Mike <strong>Quarry</strong>, who once lived and trained in Florida, once told me they fed<br />

intellctual snobs to the alligators in Florida. I wonder which animal could eat

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!