23.12.2012 Views

JSP 464 - Ministry of Defence

JSP 464 - Ministry of Defence

JSP 464 - Ministry of Defence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IN CONFIDENCE WHEN COMPLETED<br />

Part 3: TO BE COMPLETED BY HASC (AREA HOUSING MANAGER OR HOUSING<br />

PROVIDER)<br />

Part 3 is not to be distributed with Part 1 and 2. The Commanding Officer <strong>of</strong> the occupant’s unit is to be<br />

consulted before completing Part 3.<br />

Taking into account the factors in Parts 1 and 2 <strong>of</strong> this<br />

form, do you consider the 93 day NTV should be<br />

sufficient for the family to vacate their current<br />

SFA/SSFA?<br />

If no, is there a mutually agreed date for the occupant to<br />

vacate their SFA/SSFA?<br />

If yes, what is the mutually agreed date <strong>of</strong> vacation?<br />

Please provide comprehensive justification for your decision.<br />

As at 13 Jul 12 3G - 6<br />

Yes / No<br />

Where there is no mutually agreed date for move out, the AHM is to consult with all<br />

parties involved, and the LSC, to negotiate a way forward. Discussions to include<br />

consideration <strong>of</strong> a date for commencement <strong>of</strong> legal proceedings to seek a Possession<br />

Order.<br />

Has the LSC been consulted?<br />

Please provide a comprehensive summary <strong>of</strong> the negotiations.<br />

What is the negotiated move out date?<br />

Where negotiations have failed, what date are legal<br />

proceedings to commence?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!