10.06.2022 Views

James Stewart-Calculus_ Early Transcendentals-Cengage Learning (2015)

A five star textbook for college calculus

A five star textbook for college calculus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 14.8 Lagrange Multipliers 973

This is a system of four equations in the four unknowns x, y, z, and , but it is not necessary

to find explicit values for .

For functions of two variables the method of Lagrange multipliers is similar to the

method just described. To find the extreme values of f sx, yd subject to the constraint

tsx, yd − k, we look for values of x, y, and such that

=f sx, yd − =tsx, yd and tsx, yd − k

This amounts to solving three equations in three unknowns:

f x − t x f y − t y tsx, yd − k

Our first illustration of Lagrange’s method is to reconsider the problem given in

Example 14.7.6.

EXAMPLE 1 A rectangular box without a lid is to be made from 12 m 2 of cardboard.

Find the maximum volume of such a box.

SOLUtion As in Example 14.7.6, we let x, y, and z be the length, width, and height,

respectively, of the box in meters. Then we wish to maximize

subject to the constraint

V − xyz

tsx, y, zd − 2xz 1 2yz 1 xy − 12

Using the method of Lagrange multipliers, we look for values of x, y, z, and such that

=V − =t and tsx, y, zd − 12. This gives the equations

V x − t x

V y − t y

V z − t z

which become

2xz 1 2yz 1 xy − 12

2 yz − s2z 1 yd

3 xz − s2z 1 xd

4 xy − s2x 1 2yd

5 2xz 1 2yz 1 xy − 12

There are no general rules for solving systems of equations. Sometimes some ingenuity

is required. In the present example you might notice that if we multiply (2) by x, (3) by y,

and (4) by z, then the left sides of these equations will be identical. Doing this, we have

Another method for solving the system

of equations (2 –5) is to solve each of

Equations 2, 3, and 4 for and then to

equate the resulting expressions.

6 xyz − s2xz 1 xyd

7 xyz − s2yz 1 xyd

8 xyz − s2xz 1 2yzd

We observe that ± 0 because − 0 would imply yz − xz − xy − 0 from (2), (3),

Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!