10.06.2022 Views

James Stewart-Calculus_ Early Transcendentals-Cengage Learning (2015)

A five star textbook for college calculus

A five star textbook for college calculus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 2.4 The Precise Definition of a Limit 111

2. Showing that this works. Given « . 0, let 5 minh1, «y7j. If

, 7 (as in part l).

, «y7, so

0 , | x 2 3 | , , then | x 2 3 | , 1 ? 2 , x , 4 ? | x 1 3 |

We also have | x 2 3 |

| x 2 2 9 | − | x 1 3 | | x 2 3 | , 7 ? « 7 − «

This shows that lim x l3 x 2 5 9.

As Example 4 shows, it is not always easy to prove that limit statements are true

using the «, definition. In fact, if we had been given a more complicated function such

as f sxd 5 s6x 2 2 8x 1 9dys2x 2 2 1d, a proof would require a great deal of ingenuity.

Fortunately this is unnecessary because the Limit Laws stated in Section 2.3 can be

proved using Definition 2, and then the limits of complicated functions can be found

rigorously from the Limit Laws without resorting to the definition directly.

For instance, we prove the Sum Law: If lim x l a f sxd 5 L and lim x l a tsxd 5 M both

exist, then

lim f f sxd 1 tsxdg − L 1 M

x l a

The remaining laws are proved in the exercises and in Appendix F.

Proof of the Sum Law Let « . 0 be given. We must find . 0 such that

if 0 , | x 2 a | , then | f sxd 1 tsxd 2 sL 1 Md | , «

Triangle Inequality:

(See Appendix A).

| a 1 b | < | a | 1 | b |

Using the Triangle Inequality we can write

5 | f sxd 1 tsxd 2 sL 1 Md | 5 | s f sxd 2 Ld 1 stsxd 2 Md |

< | f sxd 2 L | 1 | tsxd 2 M |

We make | f sxd 1 tsxd 2 sL 1 Md | less than « by making each of the terms | f sxd 2 L |

and | tsxd 2 M | less than «y2.

Since «y2 . 0 and lim x l a f sxd 5 L, there exists a number 1 . 0 such that

if 0 , | x 2 a | , 1 then | f sxd 2 L | , « 2

Similarly, since lim x l a tsxd − M, there exists a number 2 . 0 such that

if 0 , | x 2 a | , 2 then | tsxd 2 M | , « 2

Let − minh 1 , 2 j, the smaller of the numbers 1 and 2 . Notice that

if 0 , | x 2 a | , then 0 , | x 2 a | , 1 and 0 , | x 2 a | , 2

and so | f sxd 2 L | , « and

2

| tsxd 2 M | , « 2

Therefore, by (5),

| f sxd 1 tsxd 2 sL 1 Md | < | f sxd 2 L | 1 | tsxd 2 M |

, « 2 1 « 2 5 «

Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!