10.06.2022 Views

James Stewart-Calculus_ Early Transcendentals-Cengage Learning (2015)

A five star textbook for college calculus

A five star textbook for college calculus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 2.2 The Limit of a Function 85

ExamplE 2 Estimate the value of lim

t l 0

st 2 1 9 2 3

t 2 .

SOLUTION The table lists values of the function for several values of t near 0.

t

st 2 1 9 2 3

t 2

61.0 0.162277 . . .

60.5 0.165525 . . .

60.1 0.166620 . . .

60.05 0.166655 . . .

60.01 0.166666 . . .

As t approaches 0, the values of the function seem to approach 0.1666666 . . . and so

we guess that

t

st 2 1 9 2 3

t 2

60.001 0.166667

60.0001 0.166670

60.00001 0.167000

60.000001 0.000000

www.stewartcalculus.com

For a further explanation of why

calculators sometimes give false

values, click on Lies My Calculator

and Computer Told Me. In particular,

see the section called The Perils

of Subtraction.

lim

t l 0

st 2 1 9 2 3

t 2 − 1 6 ■

In Example 2 what would have happened if we had taken even smaller values of t? The

table in the margin shows the results from one calculator; you can see that something

strange seems to be happening.

If you try these calculations on your own calculator you might get different values,

but eventually you will get the value 0 if you make t sufficiently small. Does this mean

that the answer is really 0 instead of 1 6 ? No, the value of the limit is 1 6 , as we will show in

the next section. The problem is that the calculator gave false values because st 2 1 9 is

very close to 3 when t is small. (In fact, when t is sufficiently small, a calculator’s value

for st 2 1 9 is 3.000. . . to as many digits as the calculator is capable of carrying.)

Something similar happens when we try to graph the function

f std − st 2 1 9 2 3

t 2

of Example 2 on a graphing calculator or computer. Parts (a) and (b) of Figure 5 show

quite accurate graphs of f , and when we use the trace mode (if available) we can estimate

easily that the limit is about 1 6 . But if we zoom in too much, as in parts (c) and (d), then we

get inaccurate graphs, again because of rounding errors from the subtraction.

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.1

FIGURE 5

sad 25 < t < 5 sbd 20.1 < t < 0.1 scd 210 26 < t < 10 26 sdd 210 27 < t < 10 27

Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!