10.06.2022 Views

James Stewart-Calculus_ Early Transcendentals-Cengage Learning (2015)

A five star textbook for college calculus

A five star textbook for college calculus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SectION 14.2 Limits and Continuity 907

Figure 7 shows the graph of the function

in Example 3. Notice the ridge

above the parabola x − y 2 .

limit is 0, for if we now let sx, yd l s0, 0d along the parabola x − y 2 , we have

f sx, yd − f sy 2 , yd − y 2 ? y 2

sy 2 d 2 1 y 4 − y 4

2y 4 − 1 2

0.5

z 0

_0.5

2

FIGURE 7

7et140207

04/28/10

MasterID: 01565

0

x

_2

_2

0

2 y

so f sx, yd l 1 2

as sx, yd l s0, 0d along x − y

2

Since different paths lead to different limiting values, the given limit does not exist.

Now let’s look at limits that do exist. Just as for functions of one variable, the calculation

of limits for functions of two variables can be greatly simplified by the use of properties

of limits. The Limit Laws listed in Section 2.3 can be extended to functions of two

variables: the limit of a sum is the sum of the limits, the limit of a product is the product

of the limits, and so on. In particular, the following equations are true.

2 lim

sx, yd l sa, bd x − a

The Squeeze Theorem also holds.

lim y − b

sx, yd l sa, bd

lim c − c

sx, yd l sa, bd

EXAMPLE 4 Find

lim

sx, yd l s0, 0d

3x 2 y

x 2 2

if it exists.

1 y

SOLUTION As in Example 3, we could show that the limit along any line through the

origin is 0. This doesn’t prove that the given limit is 0, but the limits along the parabolas

y − x 2 and x − y 2 also turn out to be 0, so we begin to suspect that the limit does

exist and is equal to 0.

Let « . 0. We want to find . 0 such that

if 0 , sx 2 1 y 2 , then Z

3x 2 y

x 2 1 y 2 2 0 Z , «

that is, if 0 , sx 2 1 y 2 , then 3x 2 | y |

x 2 1 y 2 , «

But x 2 < x 2 1 y 2 since y 2 > 0, so x 2 ysx 2 1 y 2 d < 1 and therefore

3

3x 2 | y |

x 2 1 y 2 < 3 | y | − 3sy 2 < 3sx 2 1 y 2

Another way to do Example 4 is to

use the Squeeze Theorem instead of

Definition 1. From (2) it follows that

lim 3 | y | − 0

sx, yd l s0, 0d

and so the first inequality in (3) shows

that the given limit is 0.

Thus if we choose − «y3 and let 0 , sx 2 1 y 2 , , then

Hence, by Definition 1,

Z

3x 2 y

x 2 1 y 2 2 0 Z < 3sx 2 1 y 2

lim

sx, yd l s0, 0d

, 3 − 3S « 3D − «

3x 2 y

x 2 1 y 2 − 0 ■

Continuity

Recall that evaluating limits of continuous functions of a single variable is easy. It can

be accomplished by direct substitution because the defining property of a continuous

Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!