19.06.2022 Views

Dominican Republic and Haiti: Country Studies

by Helen Chapin Metz et al

by Helen Chapin Metz et al

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Dominican</strong> <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Haiti</strong>: <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Studies</strong><br />

JCE was the use of ad-hoc mediating <strong>and</strong> support commissions<br />

or international observers or mediators.<br />

As a consequence of the 1990 electoral crisis, an electoral<br />

law was passed in 1992 that instituted a number of reforms.<br />

This law provided the JCE with greater legal budgetary independence.<br />

It also provided that henceforth <strong>Dominican</strong> citizens<br />

would receive a single card that would serve both as an identity<br />

card <strong>and</strong> an electoral card; prior to this law, the JCE shared<br />

responsibility with the executive branch for the management<br />

of the offices that provided the personal identification cards<br />

that citizens had to present along with electoral cards distributed<br />

by the JCE in order to vote. Naturally, this enhanced fears<br />

by opposition parties that the emission of identity cards could<br />

be manipulated to favor the government party. Like much of<br />

the rest of the state, the JCE has also paid woefully low salaries,<br />

a situation that has improved somewhat since 1996.<br />

As a consequence of the 1992 law, building up to the 1994<br />

elections the JCE leadership was exp<strong>and</strong>ed from three to five<br />

judges—three chosen by the governing PRSC party <strong>and</strong> two by<br />

opposition parties. The JCE also issued a new national <strong>and</strong><br />

electoral identity card <strong>and</strong> prepared a new electoral roll, which<br />

ended up being flawed <strong>and</strong> at the center of significant fraud in<br />

the elections carried out that year. Thus, the JCE remained an<br />

institutionally weak, politicized institution.<br />

For the 1996 elections, rather than choosingJCE judges with<br />

partisan criteria paramount, independent figures were named,<br />

who remained in place for the 1998 elections. Both these elections<br />

were relatively trouble free. However, partisan criteria<br />

again played a h<strong>and</strong> when JCE judges were chosen to oversee<br />

the presidential election of the year 2000. In August 1998, the<br />

PRD-dominated Senate named all five of the JCE judges without<br />

consultation with the opposition parties. This action once<br />

again made the composition of the JCE an issue of serious contention<br />

among the country's major political parties. Finally,<br />

after extensive negotiations, in June 1999 the Senate named<br />

two additional JCE judges, one identified with the PLD <strong>and</strong> the<br />

other with the PRSC.<br />

The electoral law of 1997 (Law 275-97) m<strong>and</strong>ated a number<br />

of important changes in electoral procedures. In addition to<br />

requiring public funding of political parties, the law instituted<br />

a 25 percent quota for female c<strong>and</strong>idates. The requirement<br />

helped improve female representation in the Chamber of Deputies,<br />

which went from 8.6 percent female representation in<br />

188

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!