19.06.2022 Views

Dominican Republic and Haiti: Country Studies

by Helen Chapin Metz et al

by Helen Chapin Metz et al

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Dominican</strong> <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Haiti</strong>: <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Studies</strong><br />

costs of a surveyor. Heirs occasionally survey l<strong>and</strong> before taking<br />

but more frequently heirs divide plots among<br />

possession of it,<br />

themselves in the presence of community witnesses <strong>and</strong> often a<br />

notary. Undivided plots are often used for grazing or farmed<br />

on a rotating basis. Families commonly sell l<strong>and</strong> to raise cash<br />

for such contingencies as funerals or to pav the expenses of<br />

emigration. Purchasers often hold l<strong>and</strong> with a notarized<br />

receipt rather than formal registtation <strong>and</strong> transfer of tide.<br />

Peasants have a strong sense of identity as <strong>Haiti</strong>ans <strong>and</strong> cultivators<br />

of the l<strong>and</strong>. However, thev have little or no sense of class<br />

solidarity, <strong>and</strong> rivalries among peasant families <strong>and</strong> local factions<br />

are common. Since the 1940s, small rotating labor groups<br />

have tended to replace large labor societies more common earlier<br />

in the century. Peasants organize work parties <strong>and</strong><br />

exchange labor to supplement family labor <strong>and</strong> meet the intensive<br />

labor requirements of peasant agriculture. Peasants also<br />

buy <strong>and</strong> sell daily wage labor.<br />

Rural social arrangements are firmly rooted in kin ties, fictive<br />

kinship, patron-client relations, other special ties <strong>and</strong> obligations,<br />

<strong>and</strong> competing factions. Community solidaritv is<br />

weakly developed. In the late 1950s, outside development agencies<br />

began to organize peasant councils as a self-help strategy to<br />

promote community development. By the 1980s, such councils<br />

had been organized in most of rural <strong>Haiti</strong>. In the early 1980s,<br />

the government ofJean-Claude Duvalier sought to politicize<br />

<strong>and</strong> control this widespread network of rural councils. Despite<br />

rhetoric of local autonomy <strong>and</strong> democratic representation,<br />

peasant councils came to be dominated by traditional power<br />

holders <strong>and</strong> outside interests.<br />

In the 1960s <strong>and</strong> 1970s, church leaders <strong>and</strong> other reformers<br />

promoted small pre-cooperative groups called gwoupman in<br />

lieu of the old community councils. The most successful of<br />

these groups were built on indigenous sociocultural forms oriented<br />

to kinship, labor exchange, or traditional rotating credit<br />

groups. In the period since 1986, the gwoupman movement <strong>and</strong><br />

other peasant organizations have been severely persecuted<br />

under various military regimes, especially under the de facto<br />

government of Raoul Cedras (1991-94). With the return of<br />

constitutional rule in late 1994, this persecution ceased. In the<br />

latter 1990s, few of the older community councils remained<br />

active, <strong>and</strong> the small group movement has exp<strong>and</strong>ed into many<br />

areas of rural <strong>Haiti</strong>. In a distinct break with the past, numerous<br />

members of local peasant organizations have been elected to<br />

334

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!