26.12.2012 Views

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

160 BIOMARKERS AND RISK ASSESSMENT<br />

increased risk <strong>of</strong> lung cancer. As, however, epidemiological studies relate to<br />

exposure a few decades earlier the risks <strong>of</strong> present exposures can only be<br />

predicted. The levels <strong>of</strong> aromatic adducts are elevated in white blood cells<br />

or lymphocytes in many <strong>of</strong> these groups. The reported total aromatic<br />

adduct levels usually range between 1 and 10 adducts per 10 8 nucleotides.<br />

Long-lived lymphocytes tend to have higher levels <strong>of</strong> adducts than shortlived<br />

granulocytes (Savela and Hemminki, 1991; Grzybowska et al., 1993).<br />

As a rule <strong>of</strong> thumb, it can be assumed that in a steady-state (i.e. long term<br />

exposure) lymphocytes contribute to the level <strong>of</strong> adducts overwhelmingly.<br />

Because they represent about 25 percent <strong>of</strong> the DNA in blood, the<br />

relationship between total white blood cell (WBC) and lymphocyte DNA<br />

adducts should be about 1:4, granulocytes only contributing to the amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> DNA denominator. Yet one has to be cautious in the comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

results between various assays even within a laboratory as the results may<br />

‘drift’ with time.<br />

The levels <strong>of</strong> white blood cell/lymphocyte aromatic adducts from<br />

workers in several industries, as measured by postlabelling, and as<br />

compared to ambient air concentrations <strong>of</strong> benzo (a) pyrene (BP) and 1hydroxypyrene<br />

levels are presented in Table 12.1. A boxplot presentation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the adduct levels <strong>of</strong> bus maintenance and truck terminal workers is<br />

shown in Figure 12.1 (Hemminki et al., 1994). The differences that were<br />

statistically significant from the controls were, in addition to the groups <strong>of</strong><br />

maintenance and terminal workers, garage workers and diesel forklift<br />

drivers.<br />

There does not seem to be a direct relationship between exposure and<br />

adduct levels. Electrode, coke and aluminium workers, exposed up to<br />

several 100 ng m −3 concentrations <strong>of</strong> BP, do not differ from the control<br />

more than foundry workers, exposed to less than 1/10 <strong>of</strong> the cited levels.<br />

The apparently higher level <strong>of</strong> adducts in the aluminium and electrode<br />

former workers (and controls) as compared to the other measurements, is<br />

due a method applied earlier with higher amounts <strong>of</strong> radioactive ATP. The<br />

later assays were carried out in small volumes but high concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />

ATP (Hemminki et al., 1993b; Szyfter et al., 1994). An increased level <strong>of</strong><br />

lymphocyte adducts has also been found in garage and truck terminal<br />

workers, with estimated exposures <strong>of</strong> about 10 ng m −3 (Hemminki et al.,<br />

1994). This would imply that the detection limit <strong>of</strong> the postlabelling<br />

method in humans exposed to PAHs lies somewhere between 1 and 10 ng<br />

m −3 BP. Whether diesel exhaust is a particularly potent inducer <strong>of</strong> adducts<br />

remains to be demonstrated. The differences between the exposed and the<br />

controls are statistically significant among foundry workers, all bus<br />

maintenance personnel and garage workers as a subgroup, all truck<br />

terminal workers and the diesel forklift drivers in particular. Coke<br />

workers differed significantly from the local controls in summer when

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!