26.12.2012 Views

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P.J.VAN BLADEREN AND B.VAN OMMEN 63<br />

serve as transporting and targeting agents for compounds that react<br />

reversibly with gluathione such as isothiocyanates, isocyanates and α,<br />

βunsaturated<br />

ketones (Van Bladeren, 1988).<br />

Glutathione S-transferase polymorphism<br />

Genetic variation in the expression <strong>of</strong> GST isoenzymes has been studied<br />

almost solely in man. Considerable variation, possibly indicating a<br />

polymorphism, has been observed for the human liver alpha class<br />

isoenzymes. The ratio <strong>of</strong> GSTA1 and GSTA2 subunits, as determined by<br />

HPLC, was found to range from 0.5 to over 10 (Van Ommen et al., 1990).<br />

However, a division into two groups, with average ratios <strong>of</strong> 1.6±0.3 and 3.<br />

8±0.6 could be made, suggesting an alpha class polymorphism. In view <strong>of</strong><br />

the fact that subunits GSTA1 and GSTA2 together make up a major<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the GST protein in human liver this potential polymorphism<br />

merits further attention. For class mu isoenzymes a clear polymorphism<br />

has been observed in humans: iso-enzyme GSTM1a-1a was found to be<br />

expressed in only 60% <strong>of</strong> the samples analyzed (Board, 1981). In this study<br />

no account was taken <strong>of</strong> the fact that a second mu class isoenzyme,<br />

isoenzyme GSTM1b-1b was also suggested to play a part in this<br />

polymorphism. In a study on the excretion <strong>of</strong> the mercapturate derived<br />

from 1,3-dichloropropene in exposed workers, however, no difference was<br />

observed between mu-positive and mu negative subjects (Vos et al., 1991).<br />

Quinones and their glutathione conjugates<br />

Two modes <strong>of</strong> reactivity can form the basis <strong>of</strong> the toxicity associated with<br />

quinones: (i) their ability to undergo ‘redox cycling’ and to thereby create<br />

an oxidative stress (Kulkarni et al., 1978), and (ii) their electrophilicity<br />

allowing them to react directly with cellular nucleophiles such as protein<br />

and non-protein sulfhydryls (Dierickx, 1983). Since glutathione is the<br />

major non-protein sulfhydryl present in cells, it comes as no surprise that it<br />

is intimately involved in the biological effects <strong>of</strong> quinones. On the one<br />

hand, glutathione can act as a reducing agent, detoxifying quinones by<br />

converting them to hydroquinones with the concomitant formation <strong>of</strong><br />

glutathione disulfide. On the other hand quinone and hydroquinonethioethers<br />

are formed. Recently considerable evidence has been gathered,<br />

indicating that a variety <strong>of</strong> these thioethers possess biological activity<br />

(Dierickx, 1983; Koga et al., 1986).<br />

The target sites for the biological (toxicological) activity <strong>of</strong><br />

quinonethioethers is to a large extent determined by the glutathione moiety:<br />

as will be discussed, the main targets are the kidney (Monks et al., 1985)<br />

and various enzymes using glutathione as a (second) substrate, e.g. the<br />

glutathione S-transferases (Van Ommen et al., 1988). Bromobenzene is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!