26.12.2012 Views

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Findings <strong>of</strong> the US-NTP study (Luster)<br />

The US-NTP study investigated 51 substances, 35 <strong>of</strong> which were declared<br />

immunotoxic, in a comprehensive test battery in mice for changes in<br />

functional parameters after 28-day administration <strong>of</strong> the substances. The<br />

correlations <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these parameters with the given classification and<br />

with the results <strong>of</strong> host-resistance studies were calculated. The correlations<br />

after combinations <strong>of</strong> individual tests were also calculated (Luster et al.,<br />

1992, 1993).<br />

The conclusion drawn from these investigations was that the<br />

immunotoxic potential <strong>of</strong> a substance can be determined relatively reliably<br />

by combination <strong>of</strong> 2–3 specific tests. The most powerful tests proposed by<br />

Luster et al. for such a combination include surface markers, NK test and<br />

PFCA. Serum titres <strong>of</strong> Ig —particularly IgA—were unfortunately not<br />

determined.<br />

With regard to the correlation with host resistance (HR) results it was<br />

found that if effects were shown in the HR model there were always effects<br />

on functional parameters, too. There were, however, also cases in which<br />

there were effects in the functional tests although the HR studies were<br />

negative. Although these investigations were carried out on mice and the<br />

choice and classification <strong>of</strong> the substances are not entirely undisputed,<br />

these findings are nevertheless confirmed by our own experience.<br />

Discussion and prospect<br />

H.-W.VOHR 201<br />

It is undoubtedly too early to make any judgement. However, it appears<br />

that apart from the histology—particularly the immuno-histology—a few<br />

additional parameters such as analysis <strong>of</strong> surface markers <strong>of</strong> subpopulations<br />

and serum titre assays <strong>of</strong> IgG, IgM and IgA are sufficient as screening<br />

indicators to show the possible immunotoxic potential <strong>of</strong> a substance. One<br />

<strong>of</strong> these is the PFCA, which presupposes, however, that satellite groups are<br />

used or that the authorities accept injection <strong>of</strong> SRBC as GLP treatment.<br />

Positive findings in a combination <strong>of</strong> these tests should then occasion<br />

further elucidation <strong>of</strong> the immunotoxic potential.<br />

In summary it can be concluded from the currently available results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

collaborative studies that the following criteria must be fulfilled if a<br />

substance is to be characterised as possibly immunotoxic. The substance<br />

must:<br />

1. Induce significant dose-related changes in one <strong>of</strong> the effective tests<br />

listed above, or<br />

2. induce significant changes in the highest dose group in a combination<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2–3 <strong>of</strong> these tests.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!