26.12.2012 Views

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

164 BIOMARKERS AND RISK ASSESSMENT<br />

measurements to host factors that may underly individual susceptibility to<br />

cancer.<br />

It has become increasingly common to try and incorporate other<br />

endpoints to DNA adduct studies. These include metabolic parameters,<br />

discussed above, protein adducts, cytogenetic parameters and point<br />

mutations. Examples include ethylene oxide exposed workers (Tates et al.,<br />

1991) and foundry workers (Perera et al., 1993, 1994; Santella et al.,<br />

1993). In both studies several parameters were elevated. The study on<br />

chimney sweeps illustrated how the intermediary endpoint may increase<br />

precision in the measurements (cf. Figure 12.3). The initial study showed<br />

no correlation between sweeping and micronuclei even though an<br />

adjustment was made for CYP1A1 and GST genotypes (Carstensen et al.,<br />

1993). There was a moderate correlation between sweeping and white<br />

blood cell DNA adducts, and adducts and micronuclei. Both <strong>of</strong> these<br />

correlations were strengthened once GST genotype was considered (Ichiba<br />

et al., 1994).<br />

Increasing circumstantial evidence associates DNA adducts within<br />

groups to an increased risk <strong>of</strong> cancer (IARC, 1992; Hemminki, 1993).<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> the adduct studies have been carried out in occupational groups<br />

which have been at a risk <strong>of</strong> cancer based on epidemiological results. These<br />

studies may be old and relate to exposures decades ago. Even new<br />

epidemiological publications on cancer cannot accurately address<br />

exposures after about 1970. Simultaneously there have been large changes<br />

in technology and industrial hygiene, undermining the quantitative and<br />

sometimes even the qualitative findings <strong>of</strong> the old epidemiological studies.<br />

This is one justification for the biomonitoring studies.<br />

Another justification is on exposures where epidemiological studies have<br />

not been conducted or have provided inadequate results, in spite <strong>of</strong><br />

suspicions raised by short-term or animal experiments. The International<br />

Agency for Research on Cancer has pointed out this as one <strong>of</strong> the criteria<br />

to be used in the evaluation <strong>of</strong> carcinogenicity <strong>of</strong> chemicals (IARC, 1992).<br />

Styrene belongs to this group <strong>of</strong> industrial exposures, where<br />

epidemiological findings are equivocal but adduct data are available on<br />

workers (Vodicka et al., 1993).<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The research was supported by the Swedish Medical Research Council and<br />

Work Environment Fund.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!