26.12.2012 Views

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 METABOLISM OF REACTIVE CHEMICALS<br />

thought to be responsible for the covalent binding <strong>of</strong> 1,2-dichloro- and 1,2dibromoethane<br />

metabolites to protein (Inskeep and Guengerich, 1984).<br />

Glutathione conjugation results in the formation <strong>of</strong> S-2haloethylglutathione<br />

derivatives, which are sulfur halfmustards and as such<br />

highly reactive metabolites (Jean and Reed, 1989). The formation <strong>of</strong> these<br />

conjugates is catalyzed by the glutathione S-transferases, and both in rat<br />

and man the alpha-class isoenzymes have been found to be the most<br />

efficient in this catalysis (Cmarik et al., 1990).<br />

The glutathione pathway is responsible for the mutagenicity (Van<br />

Bladeren et al., 1980), the DNA-binding (Koga et al., 1986) as well as very<br />

likely the carcinogenicity (Cheever et al., 1990) <strong>of</strong> 1,2-dichloro- and 1,2dibromoethane.<br />

The S-2-haloethylglutathione derivatives are strong<br />

alkylating agents (e.g. Jean and Reed, 1989). Their electrophilicity is<br />

attributable to neighboring-group assistance. The halogen atom is displaced<br />

by the sulfur atom on the next carbon atom, to form a highly reactive<br />

episulfonium ion. The intermediacy <strong>of</strong> this reactive species is supported by<br />

stereochemical studies as well as NMR data (Van Bladeren et al., 1979;<br />

Dohn and Casida, 1987; Peterson et al., 1988).<br />

The relative importance <strong>of</strong> the oxidative and glutathione-dependent<br />

pathway in vivo is difficult to determine, since both pathways give rise to<br />

the formation <strong>of</strong> the same 2-hydroxyethylmercapturate. Using<br />

tetradeutero-1,2-dibromoethane, the ratio <strong>of</strong> the pathways has been<br />

calculated as 4:1 (Van Bladeren et al., 1981b). However, isotope effects<br />

might have a considerable influence on this ratio (White et al., 1983).<br />

The major DNA-adduct derived from 1,2-dibromoethane has been<br />

identified by Guengerich and coworkers to be S-(2-(N7-guanyl)-ethyl)<br />

glutathione (Ozawa and Guengerich, 1983; Koga et al., 1986). In addition,<br />

the structure <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> several minor adducts was recently found to be S-(2-<br />

(Nl-adenyl)ethyl) glutathione (Dong-Hyun et al., 1990). A series <strong>of</strong> S-2haloethylglutathione<br />

and -cysteine derivatives has been synthesized: all<br />

were found to react with DNA, specifically with guanine residues. As<br />

expected for a mechanism known to involve an intermediate episulfonium<br />

ion, adduct levels were similar for chloro- and bromo-substituted<br />

derivatives. However, in Salmonella typhimurium TA100 a large variation<br />

was observed in the ratio <strong>of</strong> mutations <strong>of</strong> adducts, indicating that the<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the adduct has a major influence on the mutagenicity<br />

(Humphreys et al., 1990).<br />

Not all vicinal dihaloalkanes seem to give rise to the formation <strong>of</strong><br />

episulfonium ions. Methyl substitution for instance effectively hinders the<br />

mutagenicity through this pathway (Van Bladeren, et al., 1981a) and<br />

studies on 1,2-dibromopropane (Zoetemelk et al., 1986) and hexadeuterol,2-dichloro-propane<br />

(Bartels and Timchalk, 1990) indicate that the<br />

resulting mercapturic acids are only formed through an oxidative pathway.<br />

However, for the heavily used agricultural chemical l,2-dibromo-3-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!