26.12.2012 Views

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For the time being, there are only few compounds with an experimental<br />

data base broad enough to substitute these default assumptions in every<br />

respect. But there are important industrial chemicals—and their number<br />

will increase eventually—for which at least some data are available for a<br />

justified substitution <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> the default assumptions. And this should be<br />

done as far as possible when a mathematical risk assessment is carried out.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Problems <strong>of</strong> classification and risk assessment have been discussed<br />

separately for toxicological effects with thresholds (‘classical’ organ<br />

toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity) and without thresholds<br />

(mutagenicity, carcinogenicity). With regard to the general procedures <strong>of</strong><br />

today, for industry there are two main points <strong>of</strong> concern:<br />

1. Not only for risk assessment but also for classification, exposure<br />

considerations should be taken into account. In principle, there are<br />

four different exposure scenarios: (a) for chemical production or within<br />

chemical industry, (b) for industrial application by downstream users,<br />

(c) for the consumer and (d) for the general population via the<br />

environment. For a given chemical the exposure may vary widely for<br />

the different scenarios, and there are many chemicals which are only<br />

used within chemical industry, which will never reach the consumer or<br />

which will enter into the environment only in minute quantities.<br />

Exposure estimates, including worst case scenarios, should be included<br />

in the processes <strong>of</strong> risk assessment and classification in order to avoid<br />

over-conservative results, which are not in the interest <strong>of</strong> adequate<br />

health protection.<br />

2. To get away from risk assessment procedures based on default<br />

assumptions which will <strong>of</strong>ten lead to over-conservative results; a case<br />

by case approach making use <strong>of</strong> all available data is scientifically far<br />

more appropriate.<br />

These problems have been elaborated for the:<br />

H.-P.GELBKE 371<br />

– classification <strong>of</strong> chemicals for reproductive or developmental toxicity<br />

within the regulatory framework <strong>of</strong> the EU,<br />

– selection <strong>of</strong> appropriate ‘assessment factors’ for chemicals with<br />

threshold effects,<br />

– classification and risk assessment <strong>of</strong> chemicals with non-threshold<br />

effects (especially carcinogens).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!