26.12.2012 Views

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1,1,2-Trichloroethylene<br />

N.P.E.VERMEULEN ET AL. 27<br />

The solvent properties <strong>of</strong> 1,1,2-trichloroethylene (TRI) have resulted in its<br />

widespread use in metal degreasing and a wide variety <strong>of</strong> other industrial<br />

applications. TRI has now been in common use for more than 50 years.<br />

During this period <strong>of</strong> time, workers have been exposed to a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />

concentrations, in some cases for periods <strong>of</strong> 25 years or longer. This has<br />

allowed the compilation <strong>of</strong> a great data base about the effects <strong>of</strong> TRI on<br />

human health. Moreover, information has been supplemented by<br />

numerous studies in experimental animals.<br />

Epidemiological studies on more than 15000 individuals with a followup<br />

<strong>of</strong> more than 25 years have shown no evidence <strong>of</strong> an association<br />

between human exposure to TRI and increased incidence <strong>of</strong> cancer or<br />

cancer mortality. However, several <strong>of</strong> these studies had more or less serious<br />

shortcomings. A summary <strong>of</strong> effects related to TRI and/or TRI-related<br />

metabolism is given in Table 2.3. These and other data are taken from<br />

Goeptar et al., 1995a.<br />

An increased incidence <strong>of</strong> lung tumors has been reported in female<br />

B 6C 3F 1 and male Swiss mice exposed to TRI by inhalation. The effect was<br />

not observed in male B 6C 3F 1 nor in female Swiss mice nor in rats. This<br />

apparent strain-, sex- and lung-specific response fails to resolve the issue <strong>of</strong><br />

whether or not TRI is a carcinogenic hazard to man. Mechanistic studies<br />

on mouse lung tumor formation have explained the sex and species<br />

differences. In this context, chloral formation (Figure 2.10) in Clara cells,<br />

containing relatively high cytochrome P-450 concentrations, has been<br />

identified to be responsible for the development <strong>of</strong> mouse lung tumors.<br />

Importantly, lung tumors have not been found in humans after long-term<br />

occupational exposure in TRI.<br />

TRI causes an increase in the incidence <strong>of</strong> liver cancer in both sexes <strong>of</strong><br />

B 6C 3F 1 and Swiss mice following either gavage or inhalatory exposure, but<br />

not in NMRI and Ha: ICR mice nor in rats. A rodent specific link between<br />

peroxisome proliferation, DNA synthesis, inhibition <strong>of</strong> intercellular<br />

communication and cancer (Table 2.3) suggests that these responses are the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> the hepatocarcinogenicity induced by TRI. The identification <strong>of</strong><br />

TCA in cancer bioassays as the responsible metabolite for these effects<br />

confirmed this hypothesis. However, when TCA was administered to both<br />

rats and mice, liver cancer was only observed in mice and not in rats. The<br />

reason for this species selectivity in liver effects is explained by the kinetic<br />

behavior <strong>of</strong> TRI and TCA in rodents. Both rats and mice have a considerable<br />

capacity to metabolize TRI to TCA and TCE, the maximal capacities being<br />

closely related to the relative surface areas rather than to their body<br />

weights. Oxidative metabolism <strong>of</strong> TRI in rats is linearly related to dose at<br />

lower dose levels, but it becomes saturated at higher dose levels. Thus, an<br />

important difference between rats and mice is the lower saturation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!