26.12.2012 Views

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. Induction <strong>of</strong> conformational changes in the tertiary or secondary<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the enzyme protein.<br />

3. In the case <strong>of</strong> membrane-bound enzymes, separation <strong>of</strong> the enzyme<br />

protein from essential membrane lipids.<br />

4. Binding at active sites <strong>of</strong> the enzyme.<br />

While the effect <strong>of</strong> cationic surfactants on membranes is comparable to<br />

that <strong>of</strong> anionic surfactants, many proteins are obviously more resistant<br />

towards the denaturing activity <strong>of</strong> .cationic surfactants (Nozaki et al.,<br />

1974). Binding <strong>of</strong> tetradecyl trimethyl ammonium chloride onto bovine<br />

serum albumin and other proteins is comparable to that <strong>of</strong> sodium dodecyl<br />

sulphate. However, the cooperative binding with subsequent denaturation<br />

requires a ten-fold higher concentration <strong>of</strong> cationic surfactant. The<br />

saturation <strong>of</strong> the surfactant/protein complex is prevented by the competing<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> surfactant micelles. Contrary to the irreversibly denaturing<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> sodium dodecyl sulphate, the effect <strong>of</strong> some cationic surfactants on<br />

proteins is reversible (Nakaya et al., 1971).<br />

Local effects<br />

Skin compatibility<br />

W.STERZEL 343<br />

The damaging effects <strong>of</strong> surfactants on skin manifest themselves in dryness,<br />

roughness and scaling. In addition, symptoms <strong>of</strong> inflammation (reddening,<br />

swelling) can develop, which can result, in severe cases, in complete<br />

destruction <strong>of</strong> the tissue. All these symptoms are a result <strong>of</strong> the described<br />

biochemical properties <strong>of</strong> surfactants. The skin is defatted by the more or<br />

less pronounced property <strong>of</strong> the surfactants to emulsify lipids and thus<br />

partially or completely removing the surface film <strong>of</strong> lipids. This leads to a<br />

disturbance <strong>of</strong> the barrier function <strong>of</strong> the skin resulting in increased<br />

permeability for chemical substances and a loss <strong>of</strong> water. Anionic<br />

surfactants can cause swelling <strong>of</strong> the skin. As a result, they facilitate the<br />

transport <strong>of</strong> substances to lower layers where inflammation reactions can be<br />

induced (Scholz, 1967). The reaction <strong>of</strong> surfactants with proteins dissolves<br />

proteins out <strong>of</strong> the skin and leads to their denaturation. These changes in<br />

the matrix material have an effect on the resistance <strong>of</strong> the skin (Götte,<br />

1967) and, along with degreasing and drying, are an additional cause <strong>of</strong> an<br />

increase in skin roughness (Imokawa, 1975).<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> the knowledge about skin compatibility <strong>of</strong> surfactants<br />

originates from studies with experimental animals, preferably rabbits.<br />

Furthermore, it is possible to evaluate new substances directly on human<br />

skin after careful exclusion <strong>of</strong> unreasonable risks. A critical overview <strong>of</strong><br />

different test methods is given by Kästner (1980). In this context, the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!