26.12.2012 Views

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

urinary concentration at certain time points the net total cumulative<br />

excretion <strong>of</strong> day 2 can be calculated.<br />

Monitoring in occupational toxicology<br />

N.P.E.VERMEULEN ET AL. 19<br />

In occupational toxicology generally four monitoring approaches are<br />

distinguished, namely: environmental monitoring (EM), biological<br />

monitoring (BM), biological effect monitoring (BEM) and health<br />

surveillance (HS) (Figure 2.5). EM and BM are concerned with the<br />

measurement and assessment <strong>of</strong> ambient exposure and health risk<br />

compared to appropriate references. EM determines xenobiotics at the<br />

workplace, BM determines xenobiotics or their metabolites in tissues or<br />

secreta. BEM is concerned with the measurement and assessment <strong>of</strong> early,<br />

non-adverse, biological alterations in exposed workers to evaluate<br />

exposure and/or health risk compared to appropriate references. HS is<br />

concerned with periodic medico-physiological examination <strong>of</strong> exposed<br />

workers with the objective <strong>of</strong> protecting and preventing occupationally<br />

related diseases (Zielhuis and Henderson, 1986).<br />

EM was shown to be <strong>of</strong> limited value for assessing the internal dose <strong>of</strong> a<br />

chemical by not taking into account for example toxicokinetic and<br />

toxicodynamic processes determining the ultimate fate <strong>of</strong> xenobiotics in the<br />

body. To a certain extent, BM appeared to overcome the problems<br />

inherently related to EM. BM assesses the overall exposure to xenobiotics<br />

that are present at the workplace through measurement <strong>of</strong> the appropriate<br />

determinant(s) in biological specimens collected from the worker at specific<br />

timepoints (ACGIH, 1990).<br />

Ideally, not only the relation between exposure and effect is known, but<br />

also the toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic interactions linking these two. If<br />

these processes are elucidated, quantitative knowledge <strong>of</strong> a determinant <strong>of</strong><br />

one <strong>of</strong> the different monitoring methods allows an assessment either <strong>of</strong> the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> exposure or <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> effect (Figure 2.5). For example, the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> urinary mercapturic acid excretion could assess the potential health<br />

hazard <strong>of</strong> an occupational exposure situation (Henderson et al., 1989).<br />

In practice, a complete view on the relation between toxicokinetics and<br />

toxicodynamics has not been elucidated for a single chemical up to now.<br />

Occupational monitoring methods all have their specific values based on<br />

their selectivity, sensitivity, validity and logistics and should therefore be<br />

used complementary to each other. All methods operate on the continuum<br />

from exposure to effect, the limits between which occupational toxicology<br />

studies operate.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!