26.12.2012 Views

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

Toxicology of Industrial Compounds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The bioactivation to reactive intermediates by oxidative, cytochrome<br />

P450-mediated metabolism has been extensively studied. So much so, that<br />

it is <strong>of</strong>ten overlooked that conjugation reactions may similarly convert<br />

stable compounds into reactive, electrophilic metabolites (Anders and<br />

Dekant, 1994). This is <strong>of</strong> some practical importance, because many rapid<br />

in vitro toxicity screening tests, e.g. for genotoxicity, include only oxidative<br />

biotransformation capacity (microsomal fractions plus NADPH). In such<br />

screening systems the possibility that, for example, glucuronidation,<br />

sulfation or glutathione conjugation may activate a chemical is not<br />

assessed. Examples <strong>of</strong> bioactivation <strong>of</strong> industrial chemicals by glutathione<br />

conjugation are various halogenated hydrocarbons, while in 2naphthylamine<br />

toxicity glucuronidation may play a role. All in all,<br />

however, little information is available on the role <strong>of</strong> conjugation. As a<br />

consequence, it is unclear at present whether conjugation reactions are <strong>of</strong><br />

major concern for bioactivation <strong>of</strong> industrial chemicals in general. It<br />

certainly seems worth while for reasons more than just scientific curiosity<br />

to include conjugation reactions in test systems. This can be done by using,<br />

for example, intact hepatocytes (or other cells), or by using a mix <strong>of</strong><br />

cosubstrates for conjugation in combination with an S9 fraction (consisting<br />

<strong>of</strong> both cytosol and microsomal fraction). UDP glucuronic acid, a sulfate<br />

activating system, glutathione, acetyl-CoA and S-adenosylmethionine<br />

would cover the major conjugation reactions.<br />

A role <strong>of</strong> bioactivation in the toxicity <strong>of</strong> many chemicals has been<br />

demonstrated. Chemical groups that <strong>of</strong>ten are involved in mutagenic or<br />

carcinogenic effects have been identified (‘alerting groups’). However, as yet<br />

it is still impossible to predict with certainty the carcinogencity <strong>of</strong> a<br />

compound based only on its chemical structure, although a panel <strong>of</strong><br />

experts can make quite good guesses (Wachsman et al., 1993).<br />

In this chapter some <strong>of</strong> the major issues will be illustrated by the<br />

examples vinyl chloride, styrene (versus styrene oxide), benzene,<br />

dichloromethane, chlor<strong>of</strong>orm, 1,2-dibromoethane and 2-naphthylamine.<br />

Vinyl chloride<br />

G.J.MULDER 37<br />

High exposure <strong>of</strong> workers to vinyl chloride in the past has led to the<br />

realization that it may cause neoplasms in man, in particular<br />

haemangiosarcomas in the liver. Vinyl chloride is a genotoxic compound<br />

that acts as initiator <strong>of</strong> various types <strong>of</strong> tumors (Swaen et al., 1987).<br />

The major routes <strong>of</strong> bioactivation <strong>of</strong> vinyl chloride are shown in<br />

Figure 3.1. The most important first step is oxidation by (a) cytochrome<br />

P450 species, resulting in a rather reactive epoxide, which readily<br />

rearranges to chloroacetaldehyde. This may bind to DNA bases, especially<br />

the N6 <strong>of</strong> adenosine or the N4 <strong>of</strong> cytidine, yielding N-ethenoadducts.<br />

Glutathione provides protectionbecause it traps the reactive intermediates

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!