Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX A Derivation of Conversion Factor Conversion factors for several combinations of borehole diameter and tested length are presented in Table A.1 Table A.1: Conversion Factors between Lugeons and Hydraulic Conductivity Hole Size Hole Diameter (mm) Test Interval (m) Conversion Factor (m/s/Lu) AQ 48 2 1.17×10 -7 BQ 60 2 1.11×10 -7 NQ 75.7 2 1.05×10 -7 HQ 96 2 9.89×10 -8 PQ 122.6 2 9.24×10 -8 143 12 1.36×10 -7 143 30.5 1.61×10 -7 159 12 1.33×10 -7 159 30.5 1.58×10 -7 A factor of 1×10 -7 m/s per Lugeon is a reasonably approximate value to convert Lugeons to hydraulic conductivity in m/s. n:\active\2010\1117\10-1117-0042 nwmo\2100 - wp2-10 underground services\techm's\concrete shaft inflows tech memo\1011170042-tm-g2100-0001-01 appendix a - equivalent hydraulic conductivity.docx December 23, 2011 Reference No. 1011170042-TM-G2100-0001-01 2/2
INTRODUCTION December 23, 2011 APPENDIX B Steady State Solution In order to estimate the steady state external water pressures around the tunnel liner, it is required to solve Laplace equation. For this, it is necessary to define and obtain a number of material parameters. DEFINITIONS
Page 2 and 3:
Dr. Stella Swanson September 28, 20
Page 4 and 5:
Attachment 1 to OPG letter, Albert
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51: Attachment 1 to OPG letter, Albert
Page 74 and 75: Title: OPG’s Deep Geologic Reposi
Page 76 and 77: Table of Contents CLOSURE WALL CAPA
Page 78 and 79: Figure 1: Access tunnel geometry. C
Page 80 and 81: CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY and are the s
Page 82 and 83: CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY The shear str
Page 84 and 85: (H-a) = 4.25 m Figure 5: Return air
Page 86 and 87: Golder Associates Ltd. 6700 Century
Page 88 and 89: Title: Potential Inflows through Cr
Page 90 and 91: Serge Clement 1011170042-TM-G2100-0
Page 102 and 103: External radius of liner =
Page 104 and 105: ATTACHMENT 2 Attachment to OPG lett
Page 106 and 107: 8. Letter from A. Sweetnam to S. Sw
Page 108 and 109: OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 150 and 151:
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242:
show all

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?