05.01.2013 Views

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposi<strong>to</strong>ry Project<br />

Tracking Tables for IR <strong>Response</strong>s, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3<br />

Section/Figure/Table in<br />

Document<br />

Sec. 3.4.7.1 Excavation<br />

Methods<br />

Environmental Impact Statement (00216-REP-07701-00001 R000)<br />

Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA<br />

Registry<br />

Item<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Undertakings<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Undertakings<br />

Sec. 3.4.10 Waste Containment <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

Table 3.4.10-<br />

1<br />

Comparison of<br />

Waste Containment<br />

Alternatives<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

Provides additional information on<br />

<strong>the</strong> annual hydrologic information<br />

used in <strong>the</strong> modelling of <strong>the</strong><br />

s<strong>to</strong>rmwater management system<br />

Provides additional information on<br />

<strong>the</strong> quantitative water budget for <strong>the</strong><br />

DGR site<br />

Provides clarification regarding<br />

controlled drill and blast techniques<br />

for shaft sinking<br />

Provides additional information <strong>to</strong><br />

support <strong>the</strong> reference excavation<br />

method of drill and blast versus<br />

roadheader<br />

Provides clarification on purpose and<br />

integrity of waste container<br />

Provides clarification regarding<br />

postclosure safety assessment<br />

assumptions with respect <strong>to</strong> integrity<br />

of waste containers<br />

Provides clarification of <strong>the</strong> role of<br />

waste containers<br />

Provides clarification of analyses of<br />

effects of backfilling reposi<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> Undertaking TIS 14<br />

from Jul.18 Technical Information<br />

Session #1 in OPG Letter dated<br />

Aug.31, 2012 [11]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> Undertaking TIS 17<br />

from Jul.18 Technical Information<br />

Session #1 in OPG Letter dated<br />

Aug.31, 2012 [11]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-LPSC-03-57 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> Undertaking TIS 8<br />

from Jul.18 Technical Information<br />

Session #1 in OPG Letter dated<br />

Aug.31, 2012 [11]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-04-122 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #4<br />

Letter dated Aug.27, 2012 [10]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-04-152 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #4<br />

Letter dated Aug.27, 2012 [10]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-04-124 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #4<br />

Letter dated Sep.28, 2012 [13]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-LPSC-03-56 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

Page 7 of 138<br />

New<br />

715 �<br />

715 �<br />

608<br />

715 �<br />

704 �<br />

704 �<br />

608<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!