05.01.2013 Views

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposi<strong>to</strong>ry Project<br />

Tracking Tables for IR <strong>Response</strong>s, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3<br />

Section/Figure/Table in<br />

Document<br />

Table 6.10.8-<br />

2<br />

Community Issues<br />

that Affect Feelings<br />

of Personal Health<br />

or Sense of<br />

Personal Safety<br />

Sec. 6.10.8.3 Public Attitudes<br />

<strong>to</strong>ward <strong>the</strong> Bruce<br />

Nuclear Site and<br />

<strong>the</strong> WWMF<br />

Sec. 6.10.8.4 Perspectives on<br />

Community Well-<br />

Being<br />

Environmental Impact Statement (00216-REP-07701-00001 R000)<br />

Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA<br />

Registry<br />

Item<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

Sec. 6.11.2 Spatial Boundaries <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

Sec. 6.11.4.1 Air Quality <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

Sec. 6.11.8.5 Cancer Incidence <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

Table 6.12-1 Summary of<br />

Existing<br />

Environment<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

Provides clarification on<br />

interpretation of reported data<br />

Provides analysis of confidence<br />

levels and errors associated with<br />

public attitude research data<br />

Provides additional information on<br />

<strong>the</strong> community well-being survey<br />

Provides additional information on<br />

spatial boundaries and scale<br />

Provides additional information on<br />

recep<strong>to</strong>r locations that best represent<br />

Métis communities<br />

Provides additional information on<br />

rationale for <strong>the</strong> interpretation of data<br />

on cancer incidence<br />

Provides clarification on acrolein<br />

used as an input for human health<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-71 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-70 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-70 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-45 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-69 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-89 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-01-09 in<br />

OPR <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #1<br />

Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]<br />

608<br />

608<br />

608<br />

608<br />

608<br />

608<br />

363<br />

Page 25 of 138<br />

New

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!