05.01.2013 Views

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposi<strong>to</strong>ry Project<br />

Tracking Tables for IR <strong>Response</strong>s, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3<br />

Section/Figure/Table in<br />

Document<br />

Sec. 6.4 Ma<strong>the</strong>matical<br />

Models and<br />

Software<br />

Implementation<br />

Postclosure Safety Assessment (NWMO DGR-TR-2011-25 R000)<br />

Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA<br />

Registry<br />

Item<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

Sec. 6.5 Data <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

Table 7.1 Calculation Cases<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Postclosure<br />

Safety Assessment<br />

Sec. 7.2.1 Human Intrusion <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

Sec. 7.2.4 Vertical Fault <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

Fig. 7.27 Depth of Water in<br />

Reposi<strong>to</strong>ry (Non-<br />

Water-Limited<br />

Cases)<br />

Sec. 7.3.2.4 Gas Generation <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Undertakings<br />

Provides an assessment of <strong>the</strong><br />

formation of gas species due <strong>to</strong><br />

degradation of L&ILW<br />

Provides clarification of <strong>the</strong> basis for<br />

confidence in <strong>the</strong> models<br />

Provides information on resin<br />

degradation rates<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-01-23 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #1<br />

Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-04-109 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #4<br />

Letter dated Sep.28, 2012 [13]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-01-22 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #1<br />

Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]<br />

Correction Change on row “NE-GT5” on p.151 Item #11 in OPG Corrections<br />

Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [2]<br />

Provides clarification on <strong>the</strong><br />

alternative means “no institutional<br />

control necessary”<br />

Provides clarification of basis for<br />

assumed faults<br />

Provides additional analysis of<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>tical vertical faults<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-50 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-02-36 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #2<br />

Letter dated Jun.1, 2012 [4]<br />

Complete response <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-02-<br />

36 in OPG Letter dated Jun.28,<br />

2012 [7]<br />

Correction Change on Fig.7.27, p.195 Item #8 in OPG Corrections Letter<br />

dated Feb.10, 2012 [2]<br />

Provides additional information on<br />

<strong>the</strong> elevated pressure impact on gas<br />

generation reactions<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> Undertaking TIS 16<br />

from Jul.18 Technical Information<br />

Session #1 in OPG Letter dated<br />

Aug.31, 2012 [11]<br />

363<br />

363<br />

335<br />

608<br />

523<br />

Page 125 of 138<br />

New<br />

�<br />

581 �<br />

335<br />

715 �

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!