Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project
Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3
Section/Figure/Table in
Document
Fig. 6.3 Detailed
Representation of
Potential Transport
Pathways in the
Repository and
Geosphere for the
Normal Evolution
Scenario
Sec. 6.2.1 Normal Evolution
Scenario
Sec. 6.2.5 Vertical Fault
Scenario
Sec. 6.2.1.1 Waste and
Repository
Postclosure Safety Assessment (NWMO DGR-TR-2011-25 R000)
Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA
Registry
Item
Design update Updates configuration of
underground services area
Response to
Information Requests
Response to
Information Requests
Response to
Information Requests
Provides an assessment of the
influence lake shoreline changes on
the postclosure safety assessment
Provides clarification on
organochlorines and on dose
coefficients for credible complex
species
Provides clarification of basis for
assumed faults
Provides additional analysis of
hypothetical vertical faults
Provides an assessment of the
estimated peak gas pressures in
panels isolated by closure walls and
the impact of closure walls on gas
generation and migration
Provides information on microbial
effects
Item #1 (i.e., Fig. 6-7 in PSR) in
OPG Design Updates Letter
dated Feb.10, 2012 [1]
Response to IR-EIS-01-16 in
OPG Response to IR Package #1
Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]
Response to IR-EIS-01-23 in
OPG Response to IR Package #1
Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]
Response to IR-EIS-02-36 in
OPG Response to IR Package #2
Letter dated Jun.1, 2012 [4]
Complete response to IR-EIS-02-
36 in OPG Letter dated Jun.28,
2012 [7]
Response to IR-EIS-01-19 in
OPG Response to IR Package #1
Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]
Response to IR-EIS-01-21 in
OPG Response to IR Package #1
Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]
336
363
363
523
Page 124 of 138
New
581 �
363
363