Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review
Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review
Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposi<strong>to</strong>ry Project<br />
Tracking Tables for IR <strong>Response</strong>s, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3<br />
Section/Figure/Table in<br />
Document<br />
Sec. 5.4.6 Regional-scale<br />
Paleoclimate<br />
Modelling<br />
Sec. 5.4.10 Conclusions from<br />
Hydrogeological<br />
Modelling Studies<br />
Geosyn<strong>the</strong>sis (NWMO DGR-TR-2011-11 R000)<br />
Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA<br />
Registry<br />
Item<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
Information Requests<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
Information Requests<br />
Provides clarification on <strong>the</strong> effects of<br />
glaciation on <strong>the</strong> reposi<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
Provides clarification on <strong>the</strong> effects of<br />
glaciation on <strong>the</strong> reposi<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
Provides clarification regarding: 1)<br />
<strong>the</strong> confidence in <strong>the</strong> longevity of <strong>the</strong><br />
abnormal pressures observed at <strong>the</strong><br />
site, and 2) conservatism applied in<br />
<strong>the</strong> hydrogeologic and safety<br />
assessment modelling scenarios with<br />
regard <strong>to</strong> abnormal pressure<br />
evolution<br />
Provides justification for <strong>the</strong><br />
parameterization of <strong>the</strong> Salina A1<br />
Unit, and <strong>the</strong> Guelph and Cambrian<br />
formation aquifers in <strong>the</strong><br />
hydrogeological modelling<br />
Provides clarification on <strong>the</strong> effects of<br />
glaciation on <strong>the</strong> reposi<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
Provides clarification on <strong>the</strong> effects of<br />
glaciation on <strong>the</strong> reposi<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-01-17 in<br />
OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #1<br />
Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]<br />
Submission of supplementary<br />
material <strong>to</strong> IR Package #1<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-01-17<br />
Letter dated Jul.10, 2012 [6]<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-04-113 in<br />
OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #4<br />
Letter dated Sep.6, 2012 [11]<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-04-127 in<br />
OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #4<br />
Letter dated Sep.6, 2012 [11]<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-01-17 in<br />
OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #1<br />
Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]<br />
Submission of supplementary<br />
material <strong>to</strong> IR Package #1<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-01-17<br />
Letter dated Jul.10, 2012 [6]<br />
363<br />
606<br />
Page 113 of 138<br />
New<br />
725 �<br />
725 �<br />
363<br />
606