Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

More documents

Recommendations

Info

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3 Section/Figure/Table in Document Sec. 6.10.1 Radiological Control Fig. 6-29 Surface Radiological Zones Sec. 6.11 Radiation Monitoring Sec. 6.12 Underground Air Quality Monitoring Sec. 6.13 Access Tunnel Closure Walls Ch. 7 Preclosure Safety Assessment Sec. 7.1 Assessment Context and Criteria Preliminary Safety Report (00216-SR-01320-00001 R000) Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA Registry Item Design update Updates radiological zoning Item #6 in OPG Design Updates Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [1] Response to Information Requests Provides clarification on radiological zoning Response to IR-LPSC-01-08 in OPG Response IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Design update Updates radiological zoning Item #6 in OPG Design Updates Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [1] Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Provides clarification on underground radiological monitoring (air, water) Provides clarification on underground non-radiological air quality monitoring Provides additional information on placement of waste within the two panels of the DGR Provides additional information on the bearing capacity of the proposed closure walls Provides additional information on radiation dose model uncertainties and treatment Provides clarification on radiological safety of workers during construction phase Response to IR-LPSC-01-23 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Response to IR-LPSC-01-24 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Response to IR-EIS-03-62 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-04-150 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Sep.28, 2012 [13] Response to IR-EIS-04-112 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Sep.28, 2012 [13] Submission of supplementary material to IR Package #1 Response to IR-EIS-01-25 Letter dated Jul.10, 2012 [6] 336 363 336 363 363 608 606 Page 88 of 138 New � �
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3 Section/Figure/Table in Document Sec. 7.1.2.1 Radiological Protection Sec. 7.2 DGR Waste Packages Sec. 7.4.2.1 Source Terms - Air and Water Release Rates Sec. 7.4.4 Assessment of External Radiation on Workers and Public Sec 7.5 Accident Assessment Preliminary Safety Report (00216-SR-01320-00001 R000) Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA Registry Item Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Provides clarification on equivalent dose limits considered by the project Provides clarification on the applicability of WWMF DRLs to DGR on preliminary basis Provides clarification on categories of L&ILW to be placed in the DGR Provides clarification on fugitive emissions of H-3 species from LLSB at WWMF Provides clarification on assumptions used to calculate worker dose at various receptor locations Provides selected examples of worker dose estimates as supporting information Provides additional information on fire protection methodology Provides additional accident calculations to assess the impact of an exhaust air filtration system Response to IR-LPSC-01-07 in OPG Response IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Response to IR-LPSC-01-40 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Response to IR-EIS-04-102 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Aug.27, 2012 [10] Response to IR-EIS-01-08 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Response to IR-EIS-01-26 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Response to IR-EIS-01-27 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Submission of supplementary material to IR Package #1 Response to IR-LPSC-01-15, IR- LPSC-01-16, IR-LPSC-01-21, IR- LPSC-01-22 Letter dated Jul.10, 2012 [6] Response to IR-EIS-04-135 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Sep.28, 2012 [13] 363 363 Page 89 of 138 New 704 � 363 363 363 606 �
Page 2 and 3:
Dr. Stella Swanson September 28, 20
Page 4 and 5:
Attachment 1 to OPG letter, Albert
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Title: OPG’s Deep Geologic Reposi
Page 76 and 77:
Table of Contents CLOSURE WALL CAPA
Page 78 and 79:
Figure 1: Access tunnel geometry. C
Page 80 and 81:
CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY and are the s
Page 82 and 83:
CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY The shear str
Page 84 and 85:
(H-a) = 4.25 m Figure 5: Return air
Page 86 and 87:
Golder Associates Ltd. 6700 Century
Page 88 and 89:
Title: Potential Inflows through Cr
Page 90 and 91:
Serge Clement 1011170042-TM-G2100-0
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
APPENDIX A Derivation of Conversion
Page 102 and 103:
External radius of liner =
Page 104 and 105:
ATTACHMENT 2 Attachment to OPG lett
Page 106 and 107:
8. Letter from A. Sweetnam to S. Sw
Page 108 and 109:
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143: OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 242:
show all

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?