Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dr. Stella Swanson September 28, 2012 00216-00531 P cc. Dr. J. Archibald – Joint Review Panel c/o CNSC (Ottawa) Dr. G. Muecke – Joint Review Panel c/o CNSC (Ottawa) P. Elder – CNSC (Ottawa) F. King – NWMO (Toronto) References: 1. JRP letter from Dr. Stella Swanson to Albert Sweetnam, “Information Request Package #4 from the Deep Geologic Repository Joint Review Panel”, July 23, 2012, CD# 00216-CORR-00531-00127. 2. OPG Letter from Albert Sweetnam to Dr. Stella Swanson, “Deep Geologic Repository Project for Low and Intermediate Level Waste – Acknowledgement of Information Request (IR) Package 4”, August 3, 2012, CD# 00216-CORR-00531-00128. 3. OPG Letter from Albert Sweetnam to Dr. Stella Swanson, “Deep Geologic Repository Project for Low and Intermediate Level Waste – Submission of Responses to a Sub-set of Package #4 Information Requests”, August 27, 2012, CD# 00216-CORR-00531-00134. 4. OPG Letter from Albert Sweetnam to Dr. Stella Swanson, “Deep Geologic Repository Project for Low and Intermediate Level Waste – Submission of Responses to a Sub-set of Package #4 Information Requests”, September 6, 2012, CD# 00216-CORR-00531-00138. 5. OPG letter from Albert Sweetnam to JRP Chair, “Submission of Information in Support of OPG’s Licence Application for a Deep Geologic Repository for Low and Intermediate Level Waste”, April 14, 2011, CD# 00216-CORR-00531-00090. 6. OPG letter from Albert Sweetnam to JRP Chair, “Submission of an Environmental Impact Statement for a Deep Geologic Repository Project for Low and Intermediate Level Waste”, April 14, 2011, CD# 00216- CORR-00531-00091. OPG-TMP-0007-R003 (Microsoft® 2007) Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT 1 Attachment to OPG letter, Albert Sweetnam to Dr. Stella Swanson, “Deep Geologic Repository Project for Low and Intermediate Level Waste – Submission of Responses to the Final Sub-set of Package #4 Information Requests” September 28, 2012 CD#: 00216-CORR-00531-00143 OPG Responses to the Final Sub-set of IRs From Joint Review Panel IR Package #4
Page 4 and 5: Attachment 1 to OPG letter, Albert
Page 52 and 53:
Attachment 1 to OPG letter, Albert
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Title: OPG’s Deep Geologic Reposi
Page 76 and 77:
Table of Contents CLOSURE WALL CAPA
Page 78 and 79:
Figure 1: Access tunnel geometry. C
Page 80 and 81:
CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY and are the s
Page 82 and 83:
CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY The shear str
Page 84 and 85:
(H-a) = 4.25 m Figure 5: Return air
Page 86 and 87:
Golder Associates Ltd. 6700 Century
Page 88 and 89:
Title: Potential Inflows through Cr
Page 90 and 91:
Serge Clement 1011170042-TM-G2100-0
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
APPENDIX A Derivation of Conversion
Page 102 and 103:
External radius of liner =
Page 104 and 105:
ATTACHMENT 2 Attachment to OPG lett
Page 106 and 107:
8. Letter from A. Sweetnam to S. Sw
Page 108 and 109:
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242:
show all

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?