Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project
Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3
Section/Figure/Table in
Document
Sec. 11.3 Design and
Construction Phase
Preliminary Safety Report (00216-SR-01320-00001 R000)
Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA
Registry
Item
Response to
Information Requests
Sec. 12.2.3.1 Public Opinion Response to
Information Requests
Fig. 13-1 Extent of Proposed
Monolith
Sec. 13.6.3.1 Design and
Construction of
Shaft Seal
Provides clarification of how
information is identified and
communicated during design and
construction
Provides clarification on the 2005
telephone poll and the 2009 Public
Attitude Research
Provides analysis of confidence
levels and errors associated with
public attitude research data
Design update Provides updates to the extent of
proposed monolith
Response to
Information Requests
Sec. 13.6.5 WRMA Response to
Undertakings
Provides clarification of the basis for
the asphalt seal
Provides clarification on removal of
shaft infrastructure
Provides further clarifications of the
shaft seal design
Provides clarification on the rationale
for the planned top soil cover of 150
mm on the waste rock pile at closure
Response to IR-LPSC-02-55 in
OPG Response to IR Package #2
Letter dated Jun.1, 2012 [4]
Response to IR-EIS-01-31 in
OPG Response to IR Package #1
Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]
Response to IR-EIS-03-70 in
OPG Response to IR Package #3
Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]
Item #1 in OPG Design Updates
Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [1]
Response to IR-EIS-03-63 in
OPG Response to IR Package #3
Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]
Response to IR-LPSC-03-58 in
OPG Response to IR Package #3
Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]
Response to IR-EIS-04-155 in
OPG Response to IR Package #4
Letter dated Sep.6, 2012 [11]
Response to Undertaking TIS 9
from Jul.18 Technical Information
Session #1 in OPG Letter dated
Aug.15, 2012 [9]
523
363
608
336
608
608
Page 102 of 138
New
725 �
692 �