Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review
Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review
Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposi<strong>to</strong>ry Project<br />
Tracking Tables for IR <strong>Response</strong>s, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3<br />
Section/Figure/Table in<br />
Document<br />
Radiation and Radioactivity TSD (NWMO DGR-TR-2011-06 R000)<br />
Sec. 5.8.1 Vegetation <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
Information Requests<br />
Sec. 5.8.2 Milk <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
Information Requests<br />
Sec. 5.8.4 Radioactivity in Soil <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
Information Requests<br />
Sec. 5.9 Radioactivity in<br />
Groundwater<br />
Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA<br />
Registry<br />
Item<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
Information Requests<br />
Provides context for fish data<br />
baseline<br />
Provides additional information on<br />
<strong>the</strong> annual garden fruit and vegetable<br />
and agricultural plant sampling<br />
program<br />
Provides context for vegetation data<br />
baseline<br />
Provides additional information on<br />
<strong>the</strong> weekly milk sampling program<br />
Provides context for milk data<br />
baseline<br />
Provides additional information on<br />
<strong>the</strong> annual soil sampling program<br />
Provides context for soil baseline<br />
data<br />
Provides additional information on<br />
<strong>the</strong> groundwater sampling program<br />
Submission of supplementary<br />
material <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-84 in<br />
OPG Letter dated Aug. 9, 2012 [8]<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-88 in<br />
OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />
Letter dated Jul. 9, 2012 [5]<br />
Submission of supplementary<br />
material <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-88 in<br />
OPG Letter dated Aug.9, 2012 [8]<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-88 in<br />
OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />
Letter dated Jul. 9, 2012 [5]<br />
Submission of supplementary<br />
material <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-88 in<br />
OPG Letter dated Aug.9, 2012 [8]<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-82 in<br />
OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />
Letter dated Jul. 9, 2012 [5]<br />
Submission of supplementary<br />
material <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-82 in<br />
OPG Letter dated Aug. 9 [8]<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-81 in<br />
OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />
Letter dated Jul. 9, 2012 [5]<br />
Page 58 of 138<br />
New<br />
684 �<br />
608<br />
684 �<br />
608<br />
684 �<br />
608<br />
681 �<br />
608