Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

More documents

Recommendations

Info

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3 Section/Figure/Table in Document Sec. 8.4 Overburden and Shallow Bedrock Groundwater Quality Geology TSD (NWMO DGR-TR-2011-03 R000) Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA Registry Item Response to Information Requests Provides additional information on characteristics of waste rock pile runoff and potential effects Response to IR-EIS-03-96 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul. 9, 2012 [5] Sec. 8.8 Seismicity Correction Change on line 4, para 2 on p.249 Item #18 in OPG Corrections Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [2] Sec. 8.9 Summary of Assessment Sec. 8.9.1 Application of Precautionary Approach in the Assessment Table 10.1-1 Historic and Future Temperature Trends Table 10.1-2 Historic and Future Precipitation Trends Sec. 12 Effects of the Project on Renewable and Non-Renewable Resources Correction Change in last sentence on p.250 Item #19 in OPG Corrections Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [2] Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Provides clarification regarding the application of the precautionary approach Provides additional information on historic temperature trends Provides additional information on historic precipitation trends Provides clarification regarding the application of sustainability principles Response to IR-EIS-03-44 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul. 9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-04-144 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Sep.6, 2012 [11] Response to IR-EIS-04-144 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Sep.6, 2012 [11] Response to IR-EIS-03-44 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul. 9, 2012 [5] 608 335 335 608 Page 48 of 138 New 725 � 725 � 608
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3 Section/Figure/Table in Document Hydrology & Surface Water Quality TSD (NWMO DGR-TR-2011-04 R000) Sec. 2.4.2 Spatial Boundaries Response to Information Requests Fig. 3.1-1 Schematic of DGR Project Sec. 4 Selection of Valued Ecosystem Components Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA Registry Item Provides additional information on spatial boundaries and scale Design update Updates configuration of underground services area Response to Information Requests Response to Undertakings Sec. 5.1.2 Field Studies Response to Information Requests Table 5.4.3-2 Drainage Areas and Flows in the DGR Surface Footprint Sec. 5.5 Surface Water Quality Table 5.5.1-1 Summary of Lake Huron Water Quality Sampling Results Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Provides additional information on selection of Valued Ecosystem Components (VECs) Provides supplementary information on selection of indicators for surface water quality Provides rationale for the field studies which were conducted in support of the DGR project for hydrology and surface water quality Provides clarification on the calculations of the estimated effects on suspended solids and nitrate concentration in surface water due to atmospheric deposition during construction Provides clarification on surface water quality Provides clarification on regarding surface water quality in Lake Huron Response to IR-EIS-03-45 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul. 9, 2012 [5] Item #1 (i.e., Fig. 6-7 in PSR) in OPG Design Updates Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [1] Response to IR-EIS-03-65 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul. 9, 2012 [5] Response to Undertaking TIS 13 from Jul.18 Technical Information Session #1 in OPG Letter dated Aug.31, 2012 [11] Response to IR-EIS-03-66 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul. 9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-04-146 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Sep.6, 2012 [11] Response to IR-EIS-03-79 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul. 9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-03-79 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul. 9, 2012 [5] 608 336 608 Page 49 of 138 New 715 � 608 725 � 608 608
Page 2 and 3:
Dr. Stella Swanson September 28, 20
Page 4 and 5:
Attachment 1 to OPG letter, Albert
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Title: OPG’s Deep Geologic Reposi
Page 76 and 77:
Table of Contents CLOSURE WALL CAPA
Page 78 and 79:
Figure 1: Access tunnel geometry. C
Page 80 and 81:
CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY and are the s
Page 82 and 83:
CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY The shear str
Page 84 and 85:
(H-a) = 4.25 m Figure 5: Return air
Page 86 and 87:
Golder Associates Ltd. 6700 Century
Page 88 and 89:
Title: Potential Inflows through Cr
Page 90 and 91:
Serge Clement 1011170042-TM-G2100-0
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
APPENDIX A Derivation of Conversion
Page 102 and 103: External radius of liner =
Page 104 and 105: ATTACHMENT 2 Attachment to OPG lett
Page 106 and 107: 8. Letter from A. Sweetnam to S. Sw
Page 108 and 109: OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 202 and 203:
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242:
show all

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?