05.01.2013 Views

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.6 Numerical Analyses<br />

CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY<br />

An elastic boundary element model was constructed <strong>to</strong> assess <strong>the</strong> shear stress distribution along <strong>the</strong> closure<br />

wall interface, and <strong>to</strong> assess if partial loss of contact between <strong>the</strong> closure wall and <strong>the</strong> rock due <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> normal<br />

(lateral) displacements of <strong>the</strong> tunnel walls is a fac<strong>to</strong>r of concern.<br />

The host rock is <strong>the</strong> Lower Member of <strong>the</strong> Cobourg formation and has <strong>the</strong> following rock mass elastic<br />

parameters [1] :<br />

The tunnel and <strong>the</strong> closure wall face on <strong>the</strong> emplacement room side of <strong>the</strong> closure wall were pressurized <strong>to</strong><br />

10 MPa in <strong>the</strong> numerical analyses. Because <strong>the</strong> analysis is limited <strong>to</strong> elastic behaviour, <strong>the</strong> results can be<br />

normalized <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> applied pressure. The mesh and loading conditions are shown in Figure 2.<br />

Figure 2: Tunnel and closure wall geometry – boundary element mesh and load conditions.<br />

August 27, 2012<br />

Report No. 1011170042-TM-G2170-0001-00 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!