05.01.2013 Views

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

This Technical Memorandum provides estimates of inflows through <strong>the</strong> upper 190 m of <strong>the</strong> shaft, based on<br />

a) <strong>the</strong> current measurements of hydraulic conductivities of <strong>the</strong> upper formations; b) <strong>the</strong> measured hydraulic<br />

conductivities of <strong>the</strong> grouted rock around <strong>the</strong> shaft and its extent; and c) <strong>the</strong> hydraulic conductivity of <strong>the</strong><br />

concrete liner, after it undergoes seismic loading.<br />

In Situ Hydraulic Conductivities<br />

Original in situ hydraulic conductivities were reported in Golder’s Documents 1011170042-REP-G2060-0001-<br />

00 [1] and 1011170042-TM-G2090-0001-A [2] and were based on based on 1) <strong>the</strong> consolidated results of all DGR<br />

borehole hydraulic testing at <strong>the</strong> time, 2) hydraulic testing of US-series boreholes, 3) core inspection, 4)<br />

observations of fluid loss during drilling of DGR boreholes and US-8, and 5) observations on fluid volume<br />

production and drawdown during opportunistic groundwater sampling of DGR boreholes. Subsequently, a series<br />

of holes were drilled during <strong>the</strong> grouting trials, and a site specific hydraulic conductivity data set was obtained<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> following assumptions:<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

DATE December 23, 2011 REFERENCE No. 1011170042-TM-G2100-0001-01<br />

TO Serge Clement<br />

Tetra Tech<br />

CC R. Heystee, NWMO<br />

FROM J.L. Carvalho/C.M. Steed EMAIL jcarvalho@golder.com<br />

POTENTIAL INFLOWS THROUGH CRACKED HYDROSTATIC CONCRETE SHAFT LINER<br />

Borehole P1/DGR-7 was drilled and tested before any grouting and is considered <strong>to</strong> be representative of<br />

<strong>the</strong> in situ conditions;<br />

Borehole P3 was drilled after borehole P2 was grouted; however, it was drilled at a distance from P2 such<br />

that <strong>the</strong> test results are considered <strong>to</strong> be representative of <strong>the</strong> in situ conditions; and<br />

Due <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> observed variability between boreholes P1/DGR-7 and P3, a profile of hydraulic conductivity<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> highest value of P1 and P3 has been adopted (see Figure 1).<br />

Table 1 shows <strong>the</strong> weighted average for <strong>the</strong> hydraulic conductivity by formation before (in situ) and after<br />

grouting.<br />

The shaft will be designed as a sealed system down <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> bot<strong>to</strong>m of unit G of <strong>the</strong> Salina Formation and this<br />

memorandum addresses only inflows through a “cracked” concrete liner above <strong>the</strong> F unit (exclusive). It is also<br />

Golder Associates Ltd.<br />

6700 Century Avenue, Mississauga, <strong>Ontario</strong>, Canada L5N 6A4<br />

Mail: 2390 Argentia Road, Mississauga, <strong>Ontario</strong>, Canada L5N 5Z7<br />

Tel: +1 (905) 567 4444 Fax: +1 (905) 567 6561 www.golder.com<br />

Golder Associates: Operations in Africa, Asia, Australasia, Europe, North America and South America<br />

Golder, Golder Associates and <strong>the</strong> GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!