05.01.2013 Views

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposi<strong>to</strong>ry Project<br />

Tracking Tables for IR <strong>Response</strong>s, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3<br />

Section/Figure/Table in<br />

Document<br />

Fig. 1.2 The DGR Concept<br />

at <strong>the</strong> Bruce<br />

Nuclear Site<br />

Sec. 2 Assessment<br />

Approach<br />

Sec. 3.6.2 Conservative<br />

Scenarios, Models<br />

and Data<br />

Sec. 3.6 Treatment of<br />

Uncertainties<br />

Sec. 3.8 Timeframes of<br />

Interest<br />

Fig. 4.3 General Layout of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Final<br />

Preliminary Design<br />

Reposi<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

Fig. 4.5 Isometric View of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Final<br />

Preliminary Design<br />

Reposi<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

Postclosure Safety Assessment (NWMO DGR-TR-2011-25 R000)<br />

Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA<br />

Registry<br />

Item<br />

Design update Updates configuration of<br />

underground services area<br />

Item #1 (i.e., Fig. 6-7 in PSR) in<br />

OPG Design Updates Letter<br />

dated Feb.10, 2012 [1]<br />

Correction Change in para 5 on p.7 Item #10 in OPG Corrections<br />

Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [2]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

Provides clarification on degree of<br />

conservatism used in <strong>the</strong> postclosure<br />

safety assessment<br />

Provides clarification on postclosure<br />

safety assessment uncertainties (i.e.,<br />

scenario uncertainty, model<br />

uncertainty and data uncertainty)<br />

Provides clarification on <strong>the</strong><br />

alternative means “no institutional<br />

control necessary”<br />

Provides clarification on how<br />

radiological hazards change over<br />

time<br />

Design update Updates configuration of<br />

underground services area<br />

Design update Updates configuration of<br />

underground services area<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-01-20 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #1<br />

Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-92 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-50 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-04-105 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #4<br />

Letter dated Sep.6, 2012 [11]<br />

Item #1 (i.e., Fig. 6-7 in PSR) in<br />

OPG Design Updates Letter<br />

dated Feb.10, 2012 [1]<br />

Item #1 (i.e., Fig. 6-6 in PSR) in<br />

OPG Design Updates Letter<br />

dated Feb.10, 2012 [1]<br />

336<br />

335<br />

363<br />

608<br />

608<br />

Page 122 of 138<br />

New<br />

725 �<br />

336<br />

336

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!