Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

More documents

Recommendations

Info

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3 Section/Figure/Table in Document Table 4.5-1 LLW Categories Response to Information Requests Table 4.5-2 ILW Categories, including Reactor Refurbishment Waste Table 4.5.1-3 Summary of Waste Acceptance Criteria Sec. 4.5.2 Total Radionuclide Inventory of Waste Environmental Impact Statement (00216-REP-07701-00001 R000) Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA Registry Item Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Provides clarification of categorization of wastes arriving at DGR Provides clarification on use of DGR for low and intermediate level waste only Provides clarification on categories of L&ILW to be placed in the DGR Provides clarification on alternative means of dealing with combustible waste Provides clarification on alternative means of dealing with combustible waste Provides clarification on alternative means of dealing with combustible waste Provides definition of “ignitable wastes” as used in the category of wastes excluded from DGR Provides clarification regarding “leachate toxic” wastes Provides clarification on characterization of the inventory of radionuclides Response to IR-EIS-03-59 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-04-99 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Aug.27, 2012 [10] Response to IR-EIS-04-102 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Aug.27, 2012 [10] Response to IR-EIS-03-50 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-03-50 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-03-50 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-03-58 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-04-147 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Aug.27, 2012 [10] Response to IR-EIS-01-05 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] 608 Page 10 of 138 New 704 � 704 � 608 608 608 608 704 � 363
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3 Section/Figure/Table in Document Sec. 4.7.1.1 Land Clearing, Grubbing and Site Grading Sec. 4.7.1.3 Site Drainage and Stormwater Management Environmental Impact Statement (00216-REP-07701-00001 R000) Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA Registry Item Response to Undertakings Response to Undertakings Sec. 4.7.4.1 Shaft Excavation Response to Information Requests Updates information on characterization of uncertainty with radioactive measurements Provides clarification on calculating quantities of radionuclides Provides clarification on uncertainty associated with radionuclide inventory Provides clarification for the basis of inventories for key radionuclides Provides more detailed information of the existing site conditions of the Bruce nuclear site and proposed DGR grading topography Provides additional information on site drainage and stormwater management Provides more detailed information of the existing site conditions of the Bruce nuclear site and proposed DGR grading topography Provides additional information on development of the shaft collar Response to IR-EIS-01-06 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Response to IR-EIS-01-07 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Response to IR-EIS-01-20 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Submission of supplementary material to IR Package #1 Response to IR-EIS-01-06 and IR-EIS-01-20 Letter dated Jul.10, 2012 [6] Response to Undertaking TIS 12 from Jul.18 Technical Information Session #1 in OPG Letter dated Aug.31, 2012 [11] Response to Undertaking TIS 10 from Jul.18 Technical Information Session #1 in OPG Letter dated Aug.15, 2012 [9] Response to Undertaking TIS 12 from Jul.18 Technical Information Session #1 in OPG Letter dated Aug.31, 2012 [11] Response to IR-EIS-01-01 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] 363 363 363 606 Page 11 of 138 New 715 � 692 � 715 � 363
Page 2 and 3:
Dr. Stella Swanson September 28, 20
Page 4 and 5:
Attachment 1 to OPG letter, Albert
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65: Attachment 1 to OPG letter, Albert
Page 74 and 75: Title: OPG’s Deep Geologic Reposi
Page 76 and 77: Table of Contents CLOSURE WALL CAPA
Page 78 and 79: Figure 1: Access tunnel geometry. C
Page 80 and 81: CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY and are the s
Page 82 and 83: CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY The shear str
Page 84 and 85: (H-a) = 4.25 m Figure 5: Return air
Page 86 and 87: Golder Associates Ltd. 6700 Century
Page 88 and 89: Title: Potential Inflows through Cr
Page 90 and 91: Serge Clement 1011170042-TM-G2100-0
Page 100 and 101: APPENDIX A Derivation of Conversion
Page 102 and 103: External radius of liner =
Page 104 and 105: ATTACHMENT 2 Attachment to OPG lett
Page 106 and 107: 8. Letter from A. Sweetnam to S. Sw
Page 108 and 109: OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 164 and 165:
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242:
show all

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?