05.01.2013 Views

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposi<strong>to</strong>ry Project<br />

Tracking Tables for IR <strong>Response</strong>s, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3<br />

Section/Figure/Table in<br />

Document<br />

Sec. 5.4 Overburden<br />

Geology<br />

Sec. 5.4.1 Site Study Area<br />

and Project Area<br />

Sec. 5.6 Hydrogeology<br />

(Groundwater and<br />

Solute Transport)<br />

Geology TSD (NWMO DGR-TR-2011-03 R000)<br />

Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA<br />

Registry<br />

Item<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Undertakings<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

Provides clarification on <strong>the</strong><br />

environment of deposition and<br />

genetic aspects of <strong>the</strong> subsurface<br />

deposits found on <strong>the</strong> DGR site<br />

Provides additional information on<br />

locations of Waste Rock<br />

Management Area, shafts boreholes<br />

and moni<strong>to</strong>ring wells<br />

Provides justification for <strong>the</strong><br />

sufficiency of hydrogeologic<br />

modelling with respect <strong>to</strong> assessing<br />

<strong>the</strong> influence of a laterally continuous<br />

permeable unit at <strong>the</strong> base of <strong>the</strong><br />

sedimentary sequence<br />

Provides clarification regarding: 1)<br />

<strong>the</strong> confidence in <strong>the</strong> longevity of <strong>the</strong><br />

abnormal pressures observed at <strong>the</strong><br />

site, and 2) conservatism applied in<br />

<strong>the</strong> hydrogeologic and safety<br />

assessment modelling scenarios with<br />

regard <strong>to</strong> abnormal pressure<br />

evolution<br />

Provides clarification as <strong>to</strong> how <strong>the</strong><br />

hydraulic parameters used <strong>to</strong><br />

represent <strong>the</strong> shale formations in <strong>the</strong><br />

hydrogeologic modelling were<br />

derived<br />

Provides justification for <strong>the</strong><br />

hydrogeologic modelling<br />

discretization with respect <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Guelph and Salina A1 Unit aquifers<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> Undertaking TIS 4<br />

from Jul.18 Technical Information<br />

Session #1 in OPG Letter dated<br />

Aug.15, 2012 [9]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-54 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul. 9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-04-126 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #4<br />

Letter dated Aug.27, 2012 [10]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-04-113 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #4<br />

Letter dated Sep.6, 2012 [11]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-04-125 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #4<br />

Letter dated Sep.6, 2012 [11]<br />

Page 46 of 138<br />

New<br />

692 �<br />

608<br />

704 �<br />

725 �<br />

725 �

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!