Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

More documents

Recommendations

Info

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3 Section/Figure/Table in Document Sec. 4.11.3 Decommissioning of Facilities Fig. 4.11.4-1 Extent of the Proposed Concrete Monolith Sec. 4.11.4.2 Construction of Shaft Seal Table 4.11.5- 1 Table 4.11.5- 2 Waste Materials Arising from Decommissioning Projected Range of Conventional and Hazardous Wastes Arising from Decommissioning Environmental Impact Statement (00216-REP-07701-00001 R000) Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA Registry Item Response to Undertakings Provides clarification of expansion potential Provides clarification on the rationale for the planned top soil cover of 150 mm on the waste rock pile at closure Design update Updates configuration of underground services area Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Provides clarification of the basis for the asphalt seal Provides clarification on removal of shaft infrastructure Provides clarification on waste materials to be removed as part of decommissioning Provides further details on waste materials arising from decommissioning following construction Provides clarification on waste materials estimated to be generated during decommissioning on yearly basis Response to IR-EIS-04-145 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Sep.28, 2012 [13] Response to Undertaking TIS 9 from Jul.18 Technical Information Session #1 in OPG Letter dated Aug.15, 2012 [9] Item #1 (i.e., Fig.13-1 in PSR) in OPG Design Updates Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [1] Response to IR-EIS-03-63 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-LPSC-03-58 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-LPSC-01-46 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Response to IR-LPSC-01-46 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Page 14 of 138 New � 692 � 336 608 608 363 363
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3 Section/Figure/Table in Document Sec. 4.12 Abandonment and Long-Term Performance Phase Sec. 4.13 Malfunctions, Accidents And Malevolent Acts Sec. 4.15.1.1 Control of Radiation Exposure and Contamination Sec. 4.15.2 Environmental Monitoring Programs Sec. 4.17 Fire Protection And Emergency Response Environmental Impact Statement (00216-REP-07701-00001 R000) Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA Registry Item Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Provides clarification on the alternative means “no institutional control necessary” Provides an assessment of impact of potential events on the Bruce site that could affect the DGR Response to IR-EIS-03-50 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-LPSC-01-41 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Design update Updates radiological zoning Item #6 in OPG Design Updates Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [1] Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Sec. 4.17.2.1 Surface Facilities Response to Information Requests Sec. 4.17.2.2 Underground Facilities Response to Information Requests Provides additional information regarding the adequacy of the radiological environmental monitoring program in light of the DGR radionuclide inventory Provides clarification on emergency response and preparedness arrangements for construction phase Provides clarification on mine rescue support during construction and operation phases Response to IR-EIS-03-67 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-LPSC-01-45 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Response to IR-LPSC-03-61 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Updates edition of NBCC Response to IR-LPSC-01-01 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Updates edition of NFCC Response to IR-LPSC-01-02 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Provides clarification on fire suppression methods Response to IR-LPSC-01-22 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] 608 363 336 608 363 608 363 363 363 Page 15 of 138 New
Page 2 and 3:
Dr. Stella Swanson September 28, 20
Page 4 and 5:
Attachment 1 to OPG letter, Albert
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69: Attachment 1 to OPG letter, Albert
Page 74 and 75: Title: OPG’s Deep Geologic Reposi
Page 76 and 77: Table of Contents CLOSURE WALL CAPA
Page 78 and 79: Figure 1: Access tunnel geometry. C
Page 80 and 81: CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY and are the s
Page 82 and 83: CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY The shear str
Page 84 and 85: (H-a) = 4.25 m Figure 5: Return air
Page 86 and 87: Golder Associates Ltd. 6700 Century
Page 88 and 89: Title: Potential Inflows through Cr
Page 90 and 91: Serge Clement 1011170042-TM-G2100-0
Page 100 and 101: APPENDIX A Derivation of Conversion
Page 102 and 103: External radius of liner =
Page 104 and 105: ATTACHMENT 2 Attachment to OPG lett
Page 106 and 107: 8. Letter from A. Sweetnam to S. Sw
Page 108 and 109: OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 168 and 169:
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242:
show all

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?