Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project
Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3
Section/Figure/Table in
Document
Sec. 6.2.7.3 Deep Groundwater
System
Sec. 6.2.7.4 Environmental
Heads and
Hydraulic
Conductivity
Environmental Impact Statement (00216-REP-07701-00001 R000)
Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA
Registry
Item
Response to
Information Requests
Response to
Information Requests
Sec. 6.2.9 Geomechanics Response to
Information Requests
Response to
Undertakings
Provides clarification regarding: 1)
the confidence in the longevity of the
abnormal pressures observed at the
site, and 2) conservatism applied in
the hydrogeologic and safety
assessment modelling scenarios with
regard to abnormal pressure
evolution
Provides justification for the
parameterization of the Salina A1
Unit, and the Guelph and Cambrian
formation aquifers in the
hydrogeological modelling
Provides clarification regarding the
use of liquid porosity in mass
transport predictions
Provides clarification for the choice of
the hydraulic installations (WestBay
MP system) during site
characterization activities
Provides clarification of the
description and tabulation of
Poisson’s ratio parameters
Provides additional information on
geoscientific characterization
Response to IR-EIS-04-113 in
OPG Response to IR Package #4
Letter dated Sep.6, 2012 [11]
Response to IR-EIS-04-127 in
OPG Response to IR Package #4
Letter dated Sep.6, 2012 [11]
Response to IR-EIS-03-80 in
OPG Response to IR Package #3
Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]
Response to IR-EIS-04-157 in
OPG Response to IR Package #4
Letter dated Sep.6, 2012 [11]
Response to IR-EIS-03-68 in
OPG Response to IR Package #3
Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]
Response to Undertaking TIS 15
from Jul.18 Technical Information
Session #1 in OPG Letter dated
Aug.15, 2012 [9]
Page 18 of 138
New
725 �
725 �
608
725 �
608
692 �