05.01.2013 Views

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposi<strong>to</strong>ry Project<br />

Tracking Tables for IR <strong>Response</strong>s, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3<br />

Section/Figure/Table in<br />

Document<br />

Sec. 5.11.2 Rock Material<br />

Strength Properties<br />

Table 6.1 Summary of<br />

Confidence<br />

Assessment in<br />

Characterization of<br />

Descriptive<br />

Geological Site<br />

Model Properties<br />

Table 6.2 Summary of<br />

Confidence<br />

Assessment in<br />

Characterization of<br />

Descriptive<br />

Hydrogeological<br />

Site Model<br />

Properties<br />

Table 6.3 Summary of<br />

Confidence<br />

Assessment in<br />

Characterization of<br />

Descriptive<br />

Geomechanical<br />

Site Model<br />

Properties<br />

Descriptive Geosphere Site Model (NWMO DGR-TR-2011-24 R000)<br />

Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA<br />

Registry<br />

Item<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />

Information Requests<br />

Provides clarification of confidence<br />

assessment<br />

Provides clarification on Cobourg<br />

Formation attributes supporting <strong>the</strong><br />

containment and isolation of L&ILW<br />

Provides clarification on <strong>the</strong><br />

measures used <strong>to</strong> assess confidence<br />

in <strong>the</strong> characterization of descriptive<br />

geological site model properties<br />

Provides clarification on <strong>the</strong><br />

measures used <strong>to</strong> assess confidence<br />

in <strong>the</strong> characterization of descriptive<br />

hydrogeological site model properties<br />

Provides clarification on <strong>the</strong><br />

measures used <strong>to</strong> assess <strong>the</strong><br />

confidence in <strong>the</strong> characterization of<br />

<strong>the</strong> descriptive geomechanical site<br />

model properties<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-68 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-73 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-92 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-92 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-92 in<br />

OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />

Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />

608<br />

608<br />

608<br />

608<br />

608<br />

Page 121 of 138<br />

New

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!