Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review
Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review
Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposi<strong>to</strong>ry Project<br />
Tracking Tables for IR <strong>Response</strong>s, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3<br />
Section/Figure/Table in<br />
Document<br />
Ch. 1 Introduction <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
Information Requests<br />
Sec. 1.3.2 Postclosure Period <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
Information Requests<br />
Fig. 1-3 Schematic of <strong>the</strong><br />
DGR<br />
Sec. 1.9 Strategies Used for<br />
<strong>the</strong> DGR Project<br />
Sec. 2.1.5 Bruce Nuclear Site<br />
Development<br />
Fig. 3-1 Borehole and<br />
Geophysical<br />
Investigations at<br />
<strong>the</strong> Bruce Nuclear<br />
Site<br />
Sec. 3.4 Additional<br />
Geoscientific<br />
Investigations<br />
Preliminary Safety Report (00216-SR-01320-00001 R000)<br />
Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA<br />
Registry<br />
Item<br />
Provides clarification on categories of<br />
L&ILW <strong>to</strong> be placed in <strong>the</strong> DGR<br />
Provides clarification on <strong>the</strong><br />
alternative means “no institutional<br />
control necessary”<br />
Design update Updates configuration of<br />
underground services area<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
Information Requests<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
Information Requests<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-04-102 in<br />
OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #4<br />
Letter dated Aug.27, 2012 [10]<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-03-50 in<br />
OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #3<br />
Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]<br />
Item #1 (i.e., Fig. 6-7 in PSR) in<br />
OPG Design Updates Letter<br />
dated Feb.10, 2012 [1]<br />
Provides clarification on peer review <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-01-18 in<br />
OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #1<br />
Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]<br />
Provides clarification on waste<br />
incineration at WWMF<br />
Design update Updates configuration of<br />
underground services area<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
Undertakings<br />
Ch. 4 Geoscience <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
Information Requests<br />
Provides results of <strong>the</strong> 2011 shaft<br />
pilot hole program<br />
Provides additional information on<br />
geoscience model uncertainties and<br />
treatment<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-04-104 in<br />
OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #4<br />
Letter dated Aug.27, 2012 [10]<br />
Item #1 (i.e., Fig. 6-7 in PSR) in<br />
OPG Design Updates Letter<br />
dated Feb.10, 2012 [1]<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> Undertaking TIS 15<br />
from Jul.18 Technical Information<br />
Session #1 in OPG Letter dated<br />
Aug.15, 2012 [9]<br />
<strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR-EIS-04-112 in<br />
OPG <strong>Response</strong> <strong>to</strong> IR Package #4<br />
Letter dated Sep.28, 2012 [13]<br />
Page 72 of 138<br />
New<br />
704 �<br />
608<br />
336<br />
363<br />
704 �<br />
336<br />
692 �<br />
�