Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project
Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3
Section/Figure/Table in
Document
Sec. 14 References – Sec.4 Response to
Information Requests
Appendix C,
Sec. C1.1
Appendix C,
Sec. C2.3.1
Appendix C,
Sec. C2.7.5
Appendix C –
Attachment 1
Temporal and
Spatial Boundaries
Environmental Impact Statement (00216-REP-07701-00001 R000)
Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA
Registry
Item
Response to
Information Requests
Air Quality Response to
Information Requests
Cancer Incidence Response to
Information Requests
Human Health Risk
Assessment
Response to
Information Requests
Updates edition of NBCC Response to IR-LPSC-01-01 in
OPG Response to IR Package #1
Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]
Provides additional information on
spatial boundaries and scale
Provides clarification on acrolein
used as an input for human health
Provides additional information on
receptor locations that best represent
Métis communities
Provides additional information on
acrolein standards and results in
respect of the new criteria
Provides additional information on
rationale for the interpretation of data
on cancer incidence
Provides clarification on assessment
of the inhalation risk of acrolein to
persons on-site
Response to IR-EIS-03-45 in
OPG Response to IR Package #3
Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]
Response to IR-EIS-01-09 in
OPR Response to IR Package #1
Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]
Response to IR-EIS-03-69 in
OPG Response to IR Package #3
Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]
Submission of supplementary
material to IR Package #1
Response to IR-EIS-01-09
Letter dated Jul.10, 2012 [6]
Response to IR-EIS-03-89 in
OPG Response to IR Package #3
Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5]
Response to IR-EIS-01-29 in
OPG Response to IR Package #1
Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3]
363
608
363
608
606
608
363
Page 33 of 138
New