Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

More documents

Recommendations

Info

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3 Section/Figure/Table in Document Ch. 1 Introduction Response to Information Requests Sec. 1.3.2 Postclosure Period Response to Information Requests Fig. 1-3 Schematic of the DGR Sec. 1.9 Strategies Used for the DGR Project Sec. 2.1.5 Bruce Nuclear Site Development Fig. 3-1 Borehole and Geophysical Investigations at the Bruce Nuclear Site Sec. 3.4 Additional Geoscientific Investigations Preliminary Safety Report (00216-SR-01320-00001 R000) Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA Registry Item Provides clarification on categories of L&ILW to be placed in the DGR Provides clarification on the alternative means “no institutional control necessary” Design update Updates configuration of underground services area Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Response to IR-EIS-04-102 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Aug.27, 2012 [10] Response to IR-EIS-03-50 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Item #1 (i.e., Fig. 6-7 in PSR) in OPG Design Updates Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [1] Provides clarification on peer review Response to IR-EIS-01-18 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Provides clarification on waste incineration at WWMF Design update Updates configuration of underground services area Response to Undertakings Ch. 4 Geoscience Response to Information Requests Provides results of the 2011 shaft pilot hole program Provides additional information on geoscience model uncertainties and treatment Response to IR-EIS-04-104 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Aug.27, 2012 [10] Item #1 (i.e., Fig. 6-7 in PSR) in OPG Design Updates Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [1] Response to Undertaking TIS 15 from Jul.18 Technical Information Session #1 in OPG Letter dated Aug.15, 2012 [9] Response to IR-EIS-04-112 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Sep.28, 2012 [13] Page 72 of 138 New 704 � 608 336 363 704 � 336 692 � �
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3 Section/Figure/Table in Document Sec. 4.2 Geomechanics Response to Undertakings Sec. 4.2.2 Geomechanical Properties: Rock Strength and Deformation Sec. 4.3.3 Illustrative Modelling of the Bruce Nuclear Site Geochemistry Preliminary Safety Report (00216-SR-01320-00001 R000) Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA Registry Item Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Sec. 4.4.1 Conceptual Model Response to Undertakings Provides additional information on geoscientific characterization Provides clarification on Cobourg Formation core strength Provides clarification on data used in determining core strength of the Georgian Bay formation Provides clarification on the variance in strength data for the Cobourg Formation Provides clarification of the description and tabulation of Poisson’s ratio parameters Provides clarification of evidence for the overall integrity of the Cobourg Formation at the DGR site Provides justification for the proposed conceptual model of solute transport Provides additional information regarding the piezometric surface in the carbonate aquifer beneath the DGR surface facilities Response to Undertaking TIS 15 from Jul.18 Technical Information Session #1 in OPG Letter dated Aug.15, 2012 [9] Response to IR-EIS-03-68 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-03-68 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-03-68 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-03-68 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-03-72 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-04-128 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Sep.6, 2012 [11] Response to Undertaking TIS 6 from Jul.18 Technical Information Session #1 in OPG Letter dated Aug.15, 2012 [9] Page 73 of 138 New 692 � 608 608 608 608 608 725 � 692 �
Page 2 and 3:
Dr. Stella Swanson September 28, 20
Page 4 and 5:
Attachment 1 to OPG letter, Albert
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Title: OPG’s Deep Geologic Reposi
Page 76 and 77:
Table of Contents CLOSURE WALL CAPA
Page 78 and 79:
Figure 1: Access tunnel geometry. C
Page 80 and 81:
CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY and are the s
Page 82 and 83:
CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY The shear str
Page 84 and 85:
(H-a) = 4.25 m Figure 5: Return air
Page 86 and 87:
Golder Associates Ltd. 6700 Century
Page 88 and 89:
Title: Potential Inflows through Cr
Page 90 and 91:
Serge Clement 1011170042-TM-G2100-0
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
APPENDIX A Derivation of Conversion
Page 102 and 103:
External radius of liner =
Page 104 and 105:
ATTACHMENT 2 Attachment to OPG lett
Page 106 and 107:
8. Letter from A. Sweetnam to S. Sw
Page 108 and 109:
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127: OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242:
show all

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?