Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

More documents

Recommendations

Info

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3 Section/Figure/Table in Document Sec. 8.6.4.1 Normal Evolution – Radioactive Decay Sec. 8.7.1 Human Intrusion Scenarios Table 8-11 Exposure Situations for the Human Intrusion Scenario Table 8-13 Key Modelling Assumptions for the Human Intrusion Scenario Sec. 8.7.2.3 Severe Shaft Seal Failure Results Sec. 8.7.4 Vertical Fault Scenario Sec. 8.8 Assessment Uncertainties Preliminary Safety Report (00216-SR-01320-00001 R000) Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA Registry Item Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Provides clarification that solute transport through the shaft includes the shaft EDZ Provides clarification on how radiological hazards change over time Provides clarification on the alternative means “no institutional control necessary” Correction Change in the cell representing exposure of drill crew to drill core, on p.535 Correction Change in cell of row 2 (“Drill core debris is not disposed of properly”) and column 3 (“Impact of Assumptions”) on p.540 Response to IR-LPSC-03-62 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-EIS-04-105 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Sep.6, 2012 [11] Response to IR-EIS-03-50 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Item #5 in OPG Corrections Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [2] Item #6 in OPG Corrections Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [2] Correction Change on 2 nd line on p.550 Item #7 in OPG Corrections Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [2] Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Provides clarification of basis for assumed faults Provides additional analysis of hypothetical vertical faults Provides clarification on postclosure safety assessment uncertainties (i.e., scenario uncertainty, model uncertainty and data uncertainty) Response to IR-EIS-02-36 in OPG Response to IR Package #2 Letter dated Jun.1, 2012 [4] Complete response to IR-EIS-02- 36 in OPG Letter dated Jun.28, 2012 [7] Response to IR-EIS-03-92 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] 608 Page 92 of 138 New 725 � 608 335 335 335 523 581 � 608
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3 Section/Figure/Table in Document Sec. 8.8.2.1 Repository Resaturation Fig. 8-46 Depth of Water in Repository (Non- Water-Limited Cases) Preliminary Safety Report (00216-SR-01320-00001 R000) Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA Registry Item Response to Information Requests Sec. 8.8.2.2 Waste Inventory Response to Information Requests Sec. 8.8.2.4 Gas Generation Response to Undertakings Sec. 8.8.2.6 Geosphere Transport Properties Sec. 8.8.2.7 Shaft Seal Performance Provides clarification of the range of resaturation levels and consequences Response to IR-EIS-04-119 in OPG Response to IR Package #4 Letter dated Sep.28, 2012 [13] Correction Change on Fig.8-46, p.563 Item #8 in OPG Corrections Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [2] Response to Information Requests Response to Information Requests Provides clarification on the uncertainties of contaminant inventories and impact on peak dose Provides clarification on the uncertainty range in inventories for key radionuclides Provides additional information on the elevated pressure impact on gas generation reactions Provides information on diffusion coefficient uncertainty Provides additional information on shaft seal performance Provides clarification on the treatment of the shaft EDZ in solute transport models Response to IR-EIS-01-20 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Submission of supplementary material to IR Package #1 Response to IR-EIS-01-06 and IR-EIS-01-20 Letter dated Jul.10, 2012 [6] Response to Undertaking TIS 16 from Jul.18 Technical Information Session #1 in OPG Letter dated Aug.31, 2012 [11] Response to IR-EIS-02-35 in OPG Response to IR Package #2 Letter dated Jun.1, 2012 [4] Response to IR-EIS-03-64 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] Response to IR-LPSC-03-62 in OPG Response to IR Package #3 Letter dated Jul.9, 2012 [5] 335 363 606 Page 93 of 138 New � 715 � 523 608 608
Page 2 and 3:
Dr. Stella Swanson September 28, 20
Page 4 and 5:
Attachment 1 to OPG letter, Albert
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Title: OPG’s Deep Geologic Reposi
Page 76 and 77:
Table of Contents CLOSURE WALL CAPA
Page 78 and 79:
Figure 1: Access tunnel geometry. C
Page 80 and 81:
CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY and are the s
Page 82 and 83:
CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY The shear str
Page 84 and 85:
(H-a) = 4.25 m Figure 5: Return air
Page 86 and 87:
Golder Associates Ltd. 6700 Century
Page 88 and 89:
Title: Potential Inflows through Cr
Page 90 and 91:
Serge Clement 1011170042-TM-G2100-0
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
APPENDIX A Derivation of Conversion
Page 102 and 103:
External radius of liner =
Page 104 and 105:
ATTACHMENT 2 Attachment to OPG lett
Page 106 and 107:
8. Letter from A. Sweetnam to S. Sw
Page 108 and 109:
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147: OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 242: OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
show all

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?