Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

More documents

Recommendations

Info

OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3 Section/Figure/Table in Document Table 13.1-1 Potential Follow-up Monitoring Related to Radiation and Radioactivity Radiation and Radioactivity TSD (NWMO DGR-TR-2011-06 R000) Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA Registry Item Response to Information Requests Provides clarification on monitoring of tritium during construction Submission of supplementary material to IR Package #1 Response to IR-EIS-01-01 Letter dated Jul.10, 2012 [6] 606 Page 60 of 138 New
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Repository Project Tracking Tables for IR Responses, Design Updates and Corrections, Rev.3 Section/Figure/Table in Document Fig. 3.1-1 Schematic of DGR Project Table 3.2-1 Summary of the Initiating Events Considered Malfunctions, Accidents and Malevolent Acts TSD (NWMO DGR-TR-2011-07 R000) Information Type Scope of New Information Information Source CEAA Registry Item Design update Updates configuration of underground services area Response to Information Requests Sec. 4.3.2.1 Humans Response to Information Requests Sec. 4.4 Mitigation, Contingency Plans and Emergency Preparedness Response to Information Requests Provides clarification that explosions are considered credible accident for the site preparation and construction phase Provides additional analysis of hypothetical vertical faults Provides clarification on relevant radiological response programs/ procedures and emergency response procedures Item #1 (i.e., Fig. 6-7 in PSR) in OPG Design Updates Letter dated Feb.10, 2012 [1] Response to IR-EIS-01-03 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] Complete response to IR-EIS-02- 36 in OPG Letter dated Jun.28, 2012 [7] Response to IR-EIS-01-04 in OPG Response to IR Package #1 Letter dated Mar.9, 2012 [3] 336 363 Page 61 of 138 New 581 � 363
Page 2 and 3:
Dr. Stella Swanson September 28, 20
Page 4 and 5:
Attachment 1 to OPG letter, Albert
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Title: OPG’s Deep Geologic Reposi
Page 76 and 77:
Table of Contents CLOSURE WALL CAPA
Page 78 and 79:
Figure 1: Access tunnel geometry. C
Page 80 and 81:
CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY and are the s
Page 82 and 83:
CLOSURE WALL CAPACITY The shear str
Page 84 and 85:
(H-a) = 4.25 m Figure 5: Return air
Page 86 and 87:
Golder Associates Ltd. 6700 Century
Page 88 and 89:
Title: Potential Inflows through Cr
Page 90 and 91:
Serge Clement 1011170042-TM-G2100-0
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
APPENDIX A Derivation of Conversion
Page 102 and 103:
External radius of liner =
Page 104 and 105:
ATTACHMENT 2 Attachment to OPG lett
Page 106 and 107:
8. Letter from A. Sweetnam to S. Sw
Page 108 and 109:
OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115: OPG’s L&ILW Deep Geologic Reposit
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242:
show all

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?